Nasdaq Subscriber Agreement | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
Nasdaq Subscriber Agreement

An SI Board Since April 2001

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
52	2	0

Emcee: canuck-l-head	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
27	In my opinion the ranting and raving against this type of thing is a total waste	Michael Watkins	-	4/20/2001
26	Pheew. Hope you got some of that off your chest. Article in todays Globe (Fri 2	AL R	-	4/20/2001
25	And one more thing: If TDW wanted to amend the WebBroker agreement to include t	canuck-l-head	-	4/20/2001
24	I did, and they don't. Here's some Legal Mumbo Jumbo from my original W	canuck-l-head	-	4/20/2001
23	<i>"And why am I being denied a service because of a third party when	Mama Bear	-	4/20/2001
22	"Man", the only help I really need is people who stand up to bullshit	canuck-l-head	-	4/20/2001
21	Mama Bear: But the AGREEMENT doesn't even set out a fee schedule. In addit	canuck-l-head	-	4/20/2001
20	you're losing it man...get help	parker_meridian	-	4/20/2001
19	clh, the SEC would have to approve any change in the amount that Nasdaq charges	Mama Bear	-	4/20/2001
18	rhythm: Right on. Keep me posted on how it goes with Schwab. I am thinking of	canuck-l-head	-	4/20/2001
17	Al: I agree. What may be "reasonable" to the Nasdaq may not at all b	canuck-l-head	-	4/20/2001
16	"...then why would you care if you agree to the disclaimer?" BECAUSE	canuck-l-head	-	4/20/2001
15	parker_meridian: I DON'T WANT THE FRIGGING REAL TIME QUOTES. TD Waterhouse	canuck-l-head	-	4/20/2001
14	Mama Bear: Have you ever tried to get satisfaction from a government department	canuck-l-head	-	4/20/2001
13	rhythm: I'M MAD AS HELL AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE! Good f	canuck-l-head	-	4/20/2001
12	Re: <i>"Probably most people logged on at their regular time or when	milan0	-	4/19/2001
11	The manner in which TDW is doing this to their clients is inexcuseable. Probably	rhythm	-	4/18/2001
10	One reason why. <i>7. Subscriber will maintain such accurate and verifiab	AL R	-	4/18/2001
9	If you aren't using Nasdaq quotes...then why would you care if you agree to	parker_meridian	-	4/18/2001
8	Parker "<i>ROFL, obviously you guys have never subscribed to a quote	AL R	-	4/18/2001
7	ROFL, obviously you guys have never subscribed to a quote service before...prett	parker_meridian	-	4/18/2001
6	<i>"but what happens if in that 30 days, the Nasdaq suddenly decides	Mama Bear	-	4/18/2001
5	That is evasion when they blame Nasdaq. The essential contract is between the cl	rhythm	-	4/18/2001
4	Update: TD Waterhouse staff can still use WebBroker WITHOUT signing the Nasdaq	canuck-l-head	-	4/17/2001
3	You're driving with your EYES WIDE OPEN, Al. Good for you. Unfortunately,	canuck-l-head	-	4/17/2001

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):