SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Barrick Gold (ABX)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3558 49 0 ABX
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2733<b>Did the government manipulate gold to keep interest rates down to make russet-5/15/2002
2732And I'll spend my spare moments splitting logs - I wonder how it will affectEnigma-5/15/2002
2731If you really want to have fun, do a long-term correlation between gold and the goldsheet-5/15/2002
2730<b>go park ourselves on the Newmont thread </b> I would consider itrusset-5/15/2002
2729It's one of those chicken-egg things: Did the government manipulate gold togoldsheet-5/15/2002
2728I think the historical monetary aspects of gold continued to be overstated in angoldsheet-5/15/2002
2727Russett maybe we should take a leaf out of Nickle's book and go park ourselvEnigma-5/15/2002
2726Lots of theories and ASSumptions about gold moving the world through one conspirrusset-5/15/2002
2725I hope others care about where they buy a stock!! - what are you thinking nickleEnigma-5/15/2002
2724Well being that you are most likly the only one on this thread that gives a shitnickel61-5/15/2002
2723Not to lapse into a conspiracy theory or anything, but that is exactly the reasonickel61-5/15/2002
2722Wouldn't the average future price have a relationship with how much the monenickel61-5/15/2002
2721Yes - I was relaying the rumour I hear from a mining guy that Barrick is being vEnigma-5/15/2002
2720I think the market did a great job evaluating 3.5moz at about $350M, or $100/oungoldsheet-5/15/2002
2719"As part of the latest hedging transaction, the company has also taken 75,russet-5/15/2002
2718Have you read Barrick's financial statements yet?russet-5/15/2002
2717As an investor the only date that would matter to me would be the one I bought/sEnigma-5/14/2002
2716Perhaps the market is taking into account the rumour that this discovery is muchEnigma-5/14/2002
2715Gold traded in a $325-400 range (average $360ish) from 1990-1996 before the claigoldsheet-5/14/2002
2714Enigma I think that is the problem you don't understand why the only signifinickel61-5/14/2002
2713The day ABX announced their 3.5moz find in Peru, all the other gold stocks were goldsheet-5/14/2002
2712I agree that is the only really meaningful comparison. Barrick's recent (thnickel61-5/14/2002
2711Because the price of gold is way undervalued because of the last five years of pnickel61-5/14/2002
2710no sweat ...yard_man-5/14/2002
2709apologies! My post did indeed contain the 1 year time frame - it must have reverEnigma-5/14/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):