SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (XMSR)
An SI Board Since October 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3386 84 0 XMSR
Emcee:  HiSpeed Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
273608:16 XMSR prelim ($0.87) vs ($0.68) Reuters consensus; revs $227.88 mln vs $22sixty2nds-7/27/2006
2735<i>Looking ahead to tomorrow. I wouldn't expect much good news. When ci-node-7/26/2006
2734<i> Fair enough. Things didn't play out as I expected; I've said tpcstel-7/26/2006
2733Fair enough. Things didn't play out as I expected; I've said that. Stii-node-7/26/2006
2732Anyone ever seen any one person be SO WRONG so consistently? Message 18764073 pcstel-7/26/2006
2731<i> I do believe the model will scale. For example, up until now, both compcstel-7/26/2006
2730<I>Well you were the one that claimed I didn't understand the power ofi-node-7/25/2006
2729<i> It is a good point. Will these expense levels be typical? I think not.pcstel-7/25/2006
2728<I>In 2005. XM spent over 485 MILLION Dollars on Marketing Expenses to acqi-node-7/25/2006
2727Frontmed: I read the S&P report, and I used my channeling skills to talk toHEXonX-7/25/2006
2726"You have persistently claimed that ARPU is too low, SACs are too high, andpcstel-7/25/2006
2725<i> OTOH, XM has been beaten up beyond all recognition at this point -- lapcstel-7/25/2006
2724You have persistently claimed that ARPU is too low, SACs are too high, and churni-node-7/25/2006
2723<i> Talk about drinking the Koolaid! To mention XM and SIRI in the same bpcstel-7/25/2006
2722<I>Look at it this way. IMO, XM's trading range will be 6 - 12 in the i-node-7/25/2006
2721Look at it this way. IMO, XM's trading range will be 6 - 12 in the next 12 mHEXonX-7/25/2006
2720<I>10:35AM and it tanked below 11. </I> Sirius is kicking butt, thoi-node-7/25/2006
271910:35AM and it tanked below 11. I was right, no need to pay me Frontmed. :-)HEXonX-7/25/2006
2718S&P rating on XMSR and SIRI. SIRI = Strong Buy 12 month target price of $8.HEXonX-7/25/2006
2717FrontMed Time for XM to tank below 11? Soon the single digits? I can't predHEXonX-7/25/2006
2716>>>>> Companies like Iridium, Globalstar, Loral, Leap, etc. The ri-node-7/24/2006
2715<i> By "your agenda" I mean why are you so passionate about comppcstel-7/24/2006
2714The entire article is worth reading here's a bit more <i>It's wrrufff-7/24/2006
2713The "Fool" paints a way back home for XM: <b>Teaching the SiriuSirius_Rich-7/24/2006
271209:48 Previews on XMSR and SIRI: Remain Cautious on Both Stocks - AmTech AmTsixty2nds-7/24/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):