SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Silkroad
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
626 32 0
Emcee:  ahhaha Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
276 Carl, I'm looking for that message I referenced in my previous post. Maybe Frank A. Coluccio-3/4/1999
275 Carl, it's uncanny how close your assessment, in certain parts, is to one wFrank A. Coluccio-3/4/1999
274 That's interesting, and suggests what we've discussed in the past, re pFrank A. Coluccio-3/4/1999
273 George Santamaria writes: "You see, upon reading the paper, it becomes appCarl Hindman-3/4/1999
272 Not all that difficult if the device is small. NBS (Now NIST) in the 60's Carl Hindman-3/4/1999
271 It's a point. It could also be disinformation. I'm pretty sure it is whahhaha-3/4/1999
270 ahhaha: Thanks for taking the time to review the patent. I have been mostly lwonk-3/3/1999
269 2 hours and six pages into the patent and I must say I owe Woreless_Wonk for hiahhaha-3/3/1999
268 I had made a cursory examination of the patent and had erroneously concluded thahhaha-3/3/1999
267 <i>represented by a pure momentum state, which implies that the photon isahhaha-3/3/1999
266 Research results follow: Letter from CTO @ Silkroad This indicates that there Kachina-3/3/1999
265 SteveG, Real good to see you here. Thanks for that personal note on my behalf.Frank A. Coluccio-3/3/1999
264 <..Photonics is not like Quantum Electrodynamics which is very well theoretiSteveG-3/3/1999
263 I wonder for whom you are working. I am starting to suspect you were sent by onahhaha-3/2/1999
262 Carl, that's ok. I thought it was a different school altogether: Stanford UFrank A. Coluccio-3/2/1999
261 Kachina writes: "My inquiries to UCSD have turned up nobody anywhere who Carl Hindman-3/2/1999
260 Take my word these are two of the most reputable men you could possibly meet. Ahda-3/2/1999
259 Well - I would ask that those who post in such a thread as this post substantivKachina-3/2/1999
258 LOL! That is the most ridiculous tripe I've heard in a while. Who on earth Kachina-3/2/1999
257 Kachina, I'm not interested in drawing figures in the snow over this, eithFrank A. Coluccio-3/2/1999
256 If SR works as advertised, they literally introduce a revolutionary major changahhaha-3/2/1999
255 I also want to say, that in itself that fact that people in the company have beKachina-3/2/1999
254 When the thread was conceived is not at all central and I don't care to disKachina-3/2/1999
253 Kachina, I thought that I would let you scientists and vigilantes duke it outFrank A. Coluccio-3/2/1999
252 Iwant to add some comments here regarding the white paper. When the paper getsGeorge T. Santamaria-3/2/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News