SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Politics for Morons – Thread Moron Political Annex
An SI Board Since May 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
326 10 0
Emcee:  Tom C Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
276You have totally misinterpreted what I said. I don't think that, and I didnepicure-7/7/2005
275Here is some context. <i>This is a dagger aimed right at the heart of taTom C-7/6/2005
274Again, I don't know what particular judge or ruling he was referring to, butOeconomicus-7/6/2005
273<i>You seem to be imagining arguments that haven't been made.</i>Tom C-7/6/2005
272<i>If so, it was prompted by the implication in the post I replied to thatTom C-7/6/2005
271<i>"How can you claim an illegality when there are NO LAWS."<Oeconomicus-7/6/2005
270<i>"Where did that response come from."</i> From me. ThatOeconomicus-7/6/2005
269<i>If you still think there was some illegality in the outcome, then you cTom C-7/6/2005
268<i>A "nation of laws" doesn't mean "we're gonna keeTom C-7/6/2005
267If you still think there was some illegality in the outcome, then you clearly arOeconomicus-7/6/2005
266Good point, and all so very ironic. We are a nation of laws when the laws go ouepicure-7/6/2005
265<i>And was it a nation of laws when the SC helped make Bush president? If Tom C-7/6/2005
264Excuse me? I know he lost, and I am over it. Please try to be civil. Pretend epicure-7/6/2005
263A "nation of laws" doesn't mean "we're gonna keep countinOeconomicus-7/6/2005
262And was it a nation of laws when the SC helped make Bush president? If it was nepicure-7/6/2005
261I'm not sure if I can pass on this one. Maybe not a nominee but it seems a lTom C-7/6/2005
260I can not make a blanket statement because I have not studied "all religionjlallen-7/5/2005
259do you think all religions are the same ? Are some more tolerant then others ?longnshort-7/5/2005
258No...not the religion......the fanatics who pervert the religion...jlallen-7/5/2005
257Some religions have more wiggle room where fanatics are allowed or at least not longnshort-7/5/2005
256Thanks. I think it is important to keep that outlook in perspective. J.jlallen-7/5/2005
255agreed.one_less-7/5/2005
254I think you both have a point. It is NOT religion which is the problem. The projlallen-7/5/2005
253rightlongnshort-7/5/2005
252yes.one_less-7/5/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):