SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
A CENTURY OF LIONS/THE 20TH CENTURY TOP 100
An SI Board Since October 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3246 12 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
2821 If you liked "Mote" (and its follower, "The Gripping Hand")Jacques Chitte-5/15/2000
2820 You may be right about "That Hideous Strength" being wrongly categoriNeocon-5/15/2000
2819 I would agree that "Brave New World" must make the cut and that "Raymond Clutts-5/15/2000
2818 "The War of the Worlds" was published in 1898, but some of his books Neocon-5/15/2000
2817 Hmm. I must have been out for a beer when that parade went by. For the most paRaymond Clutts-5/15/2000
2816 Agreed. It would contradict their worldview of scientists and techies as evil Raymond Clutts-5/15/2000
2815 OK but like all puns it suffers unless when it's separated from the contextRaymond Clutts-5/15/2000
2814 I have not read "The Mote in God's Eye". I am afraid I am not an Neocon-5/15/2000
2813 There is a sequel to The Mote In God's Eye. It's called The Gripping HaTom Clarke-5/15/2000
2812 Well....are you going to tell us what the pun is?Tom Clarke-5/15/2000
2811 OOPS! There he is already on the list at #70. Well shut my mouth. Still thereRaymond Clutts-5/15/2000
2810 Yes I have read it. Although, if you're in the mood for millenarian depresRaymond Clutts-5/15/2000
2809 I am glad that you approve of my solution. Suddenly, it made sense to me. NeithNeocon-5/15/2000
2808 Hurrah! Virtue and wisdom are triumphant. Now this weekend I began rereading Raymond Clutts-5/15/2000
2807 Yes, a case can be made, which is why I do not feel guilty about putting him onNeocon-5/14/2000
2806 Argument, Bill, this is not open to a vote. You either persuade me or make yourNeocon-5/14/2000
2805 Borges is on the list because you were badgered to show some diversity? tsk tskTom Clarke-5/14/2000
2804 Elvis yes, Dylan no.Bill-5/13/2000
2803 I am about done, too. See you later!Neocon-5/12/2000
2802 Right! Gotta run, I'll go over your list later, so I can help you with newsandintoes-5/12/2000
2801 Yes, very impressive.......Neocon-5/12/2000
2800artloft.com Beautiful pictures!sandintoes-5/12/2000
2799 Actually, I am fond of Borges, but I am uncertain he belongs, and was mainly baNeocon-5/12/2000
2798 Not trying to be critical, but why is Jorge Luis Borges on the list? Inquiring Tom Clarke-5/12/2000
2797 Actually, he was more likely to paint both eyes on one side of the head.... PaNeocon-5/12/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):