SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went!
An SI Board Since February 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
28311 135 0 INSP
Emcee:  White Shoes Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
28211It is just amazing. But then Seattle itself is something else again too...MakesKLP-3/10/2005
28210Good question, unless Washington has a different code of conduct for felons.sandintoes-3/10/2005
28209Hey, watch you tongue! I guess I just got confused with all your ramblings. EasSarkie-3/10/2005
28208It looks like everyone gets the point except for the judges.Sarkie-3/10/2005
28207It seems so blatant a crime...I'd really like an attorney to explain to me/uKLP-3/10/2005
28206So this was Jain's total punishment? <B>MIKE SIEGEL / THE SEATTLE TIMsandintoes-3/10/2005
28205I don't think so either. Incredible huh?Luce Wildebeest-3/10/2005
28204<i>What the hell is the SEC for??</i> I ask myself the same questioKLP-3/10/2005
28203I know that trading on inside info, which she clearly did, is illegal. It does The O-3/10/2005
28202Regarding your comment "on the subject of Jain being more of an AA then youlevy-3/10/2005
28201Re ST article: Looks like several others agree with the AA being a BIG cut abovKLP-3/10/2005
28200Not sure about Puna living in his van or portable thatched hut. When I met him Sarkie-3/9/2005
28199Dear Sarkie I am sorry that I have not chimed in for a few days.... I just read levy-3/9/2005
28198No idea. I have not really been following the case. My interest was piqued bAlan Smithee-3/9/2005
28197Another thing, I remember they were using RICO against Jain, what happened to Sarkie-3/9/2005
28196To my knowledge, Jain has never been arrested, has he?sandintoes-3/9/2005
28195Being a lawyer in Washington must be lucrative with all of the crooks. Stop anyosandintoes-3/9/2005
28194Isn't it amazing the man is still out there walking around free as a bird?sandintoes-3/9/2005
28193Wonder why and when she went inactive....?KLP-3/9/2005
28192LOL!! So, do you think they can handle only one matter at a time?Sarkie-3/8/2005
28191But there is no statute of limitations on fraud.Sarkie-3/8/2005
28190<i>This is BIG!! Why aren't the Feds going after this???</i> UhAlan Smithee-3/8/2005
28189We have a facility about 3 miles from my house where I'm sure he'd be weAlan Smithee-3/8/2005
28188Sure. Wouldn't even have to find him guilty of fraud.Alan Smithee-3/8/2005
28187She is listed by the WSBA as being an inactive member with, gasp, a Poverty RockAlan Smithee-3/8/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):