SNRS- Sunrise Technologies | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
SNRS- Sunrise Technologies

An SI Board Since October 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
4140	25	0	SNRS

Emcee: WILLIAM BLACK	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
2840	FDA Rejection Sends Sunrise Stock Plummeting By DAVID J.	wl9839	-	7/24/1999
2839	Skane, All, A friend from NY saw an article in today NY times Business section,	Sylvester	-	7/24/1999
2838	>The analyst from Kinnard, was informed, well spoken, but completely wrong	Jacques Chitte	-	7/24/1999
2837	<i> Can the co make this stick? </i> Of course the time to make th	Dr. Voodoo	-	7/24/1999
2836	Where to go with SNRS from here! SNRS will trade down for a few days, then the	Terry Barcus	-	7/24/1999
2835	Dave, I think we all need to relax and re-evaluate now. ALL of us are in abso	majormember	-	7/24/1999
2834	One thing I don't understand is that the CLINICAL INVESTIGATORS owning the	dave brown	-	7/24/1999
2833	Cont.......... As I have PM many of you, I think the BEST solution is if Russ	majormember	-	7/24/1999
2832	Barry, First....that was an EXCELLENT post! Secondly, I think EVERYONE is miss	majormember	-	7/24/1999
2831	24 hours out, the anger subsided, and my problem is that I broke all my own rul	Sylvester	-	7/24/1999
2830	Obviously, political matters are about who ever has the most money and influen	Duke	-	7/24/1999
2829	BARRY, Yes, it was a great post! What can we, the shareholders, do to question	Katz R Us	-	7/23/1999
2828	Forget it. Move on. If this had any legitimacy, they would have been approved	Optmaster	-	7/23/1999
2827	The whole case was a major setup,I have seen it before,I am sure we will see it	BigAppleBoy	-	7/23/1999
2826	Thanks, Barry, for sharing your experiences and thoughts. I agree that what we	BostonView	-	7/23/1999
2825	GREAT POST! CUBBY	CUBBY	-	7/23/1999
2824	<b>HIGH SPECULATION??</b> It's been over 24 hours since the OD	BARRY ALLEN	-	7/23/1999
2823	KERA 20.7	Sir Auric Goldfinger	-	7/23/1999
2822	Just admit it folks it was a HIGH SPECULATION stock, you either are a player or	Harry N	-	7/23/1999
2821	How unusual is it for clinicians to buy the stock of the company they're te	E	-	7/23/1999
2820	>>>OK, what does SNRS need to do to satisfy the FDA re conflict of i	majormember	-	7/23/1999
2819	OK, what does SNRS need to do to satisfy the FDA re conflict of interest? Does	Jacques Chitte	-	7/23/1999
2818	>>>>Now, what was the reason, again, that snrs was permitted to op	majormember	-	7/23/1999
2817	That's good. Now, what was the reason, again, that snrs was permitted to	E	-	7/23/1999
2816	Some reassuring info from the Vcall conference SNRS Burn Rate: 1997:	Jacques Chitte	-	7/23/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):