SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
New FADG.
An SI Board Since May 2007
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
4152 22 0
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromPosted
2852This is my final post on the subject, of course, I'm not sure what the subjeElroy7/28/2007
2851OT: Talking about culture, here's a decent laugh: Q: Whats the difference bekumar7/28/2007
2850yeah you just had to get the last word in. Oh wait... I just got it.longnshort7/28/2007
2849Yeah, I've known that for a while. The person in question doesn't seem Elroy7/28/2007
2848Geez, now you're getting way off the topic. I will not get into India and tBrumar897/28/2007
2847I stated 3 days ago "end of discussion" and did not get back till todakumar7/28/2007
2846it's getting the last word in thingy, you notice even you discussing this thlongnshort7/28/2007
2845after having told words to the effect of "lets agree to disagree", whakumar7/28/2007
2844<i>agree. but a position that does not budge has to be told to stop.</iElroy7/28/2007
2843<i>Voting in a party friendlier to the US and voting out one less friendlyjlallen7/28/2007
2842agree. but a position that does not budge has to be told to stop.kumar7/28/2007
2841the Canadian thing was something you started. Go back to the history of posts - kumar7/28/2007
2840If you don't want to discuss it, stop responding to his posts. As long as yElroy7/28/2007
2839You have been offensive Kumar. The Canadian thing was silly and could have endedGST7/28/2007
2838it was to the point without being offensive in language.kumar7/28/2007
2837That was just plain rude Kumar.GST7/28/2007
2836deleteGST7/28/2007
2835WHAT PART OF "I AM DONE" or I DO NOT WISH TO DEBATE/DISCUSS WITH YOU&qkumar7/28/2007
2834That is fine Kumar, but when India took a vote to adopt a policy that reflected GST7/28/2007
2833there was no India before - it was a bunch of kingdoms. get that straight and thkumar7/28/2007
2832I have no idea whatsoever what your docs have to do with a vote taken by the IndGST7/28/2007
2831do what u want. I dont care. I have 9 generations of doc in my home in india, thkumar7/28/2007
2830I get that you are ignorant of government policy on multiculturalism -- but hey,GST7/28/2007
2829i have said I do not wish to debate/discuss this with you. WHAT PART OF THAT Dkumar7/28/2007
2828Hurray for you, you were born in India. Now what do you know about MULTICULTURALGST7/28/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News