SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Discuss Go2Net's acquisition of our beloved SI
An SI Board Since April 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
446 20 0
Emcee:  purecntry5 Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
296 Graystone Your Hi-tech-Sci-fic story is pretty cool!!!! Having a little tasteThe Devil Dog-4/29/1998
295 <<<<< Sometimes when I check a thread, there are over 100 new dave rose-4/29/1998
294 <i>" I have also seen simple questions provoke a response of "RCatLady-4/29/1998
293 I have also seen simple questions provoke a response of "Read the posts onScanner Man-4/29/1998
292 <i>" It would be unfair to base grandfathering on quantity of posts CatLady-4/29/1998
291 Karen, That was an eloquent post. Like you, I have been lurking in several thrScanner Man-4/29/1998
290 You never know what is in a person's head ..... How you can read my post anJesse-4/29/1998
289 Mr. Sphar, <<<i>I know for a fact that at more than one high tech Jerry in Omaha-4/29/1998
288 re D.U.M.B.A.S.S. You are all delightful. What a funny discussion this has becofreeus-4/29/1998
287 Could not have said it better myself!!!! Regards WBThe Devil Dog-4/29/1998
286 Corporate insiders and lurkers--- Michael Sphar commented "<i>A recDick Smith-4/29/1998
285 I have the same consideration about the lifetime memberships. But I also thinkMARCIA J. SHATTAN-4/29/1998
284 Brad did you know that a musical genious posts on SI? Member 4098856 -UrlmanUrlman-4/29/1998
283 Jesse: >>Cheeky Kid-4/28/1998
282 I hope you get all from this that you desire ..... however if it was a $ thing Jesse-4/28/1998
281 Oh my! I'm sorry that my response offended you. I thought I understood yoLane3-4/28/1998
280 A recent officer posting in a thread I follow: exchange2000.com Note the respMichael Sphar-4/28/1998
279 This thread - symbol DGAQ Volume - down 80% Participants - Daytraders only Pripeter michaelson-4/28/1998
278 I think it is the emotion and opinions it brings out in people. Why doesn'Cheeky Kid-4/28/1998
277 OK, you guys. What do you find that's sooooooo amusing in this lurker thinpeter michaelson-4/28/1998
276 So I guess a new batch of names may be needed: <b&gCheeky Kid-4/28/1998
275 Michael, Re: <i>senior execs and officers of the companies talked about iNazbuster-4/28/1998
274 I had some brief discussions with Brad, Jeff, and Jill regarding one sub-class Michael Sphar-4/28/1998
273 <b>P</b>assive <b>P</b>eruser of <b>P</b>osNazbuster-4/28/1998
272 re <i>stalker</i> VVVBG I thought of that but resisted writing it! freeus-4/28/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):