SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Left Wing Democratic Porch
An SI Board Since January 2017
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2202 34 1
Emcee:  Rarebird Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
302I just support empowering women to be self-reliant and independent. I've datRarebird-2/1/2017
301Most New Yorkers (in NYC) have a strong love for Montreal and Toronto. Not so muRarebird-2/1/2017
300"what do you have in common with this thread," Hard to say. Are you a Wharf Rat-2/1/2017
299Quebec was close... but the attitude their has drastically changed... The rationCogito Ergo Sum-2/1/2017
298So, what do you have in common with this thread, outside of it possibly providinRarebird-2/1/2017
297We don't seem to have much in common with the rest of the country. CaliforWharf Rat-2/1/2017
296Yes, it is, because you are divorcing yourself, as a selfish POS, from the rest Rarebird-2/1/2017
295A second American Revolution is OK, but Calif secession is OT? "I, for oneWharf Rat-2/1/2017
294You are way off topic here. You will need to start your own CA secession thread Rarebird-2/1/2017
293"the CA solution is to just worry about and take care of itself" I woWharf Rat-2/1/2017
292So, the CA solution is to just worry about and take care of itself and say FU toRarebird-2/1/2017
291"I, for one, would be quite prepared to fight for the second coming of the Wharf Rat-2/1/2017
290That's possible, but we can't succumb to that notion. The time to try toRarebird12/1/2017
289"a new movement and the continuation of that movement in 2020 would not be Wharf Rat12/1/2017
288I read the article and it is mighty scary. I sure hope the media is alerted to wRarebird-2/1/2017
287The Clinton campaign was a lot more organized, with much more money at their disRarebird-2/1/2017
286"He could easily have had the nomination if it weren't for all the insiWharf Rat-2/1/2017
285I think in the end it was too late for Bernie to split from the party and get anbenwood12/1/2017
284I know there were pissed Bernie supporters, but either he could endorse Clinton benwood22/1/2017
283That's a very good point. His argument was that Hillary would have made a beRarebird-2/1/2017
282So what were everybody's thoughts when Sanders started backing Hillary? I uHorgad22/1/2017
281The thread header makes it very clear what this thread is all about. If you don&Rarebird-2/1/2017
280I am not as negative on the Democratic Party as you sometimes are moving forwardRarebird12/1/2017
279I do think Tulsi would blow R's away and become a shining light for the D paBroken_Clock-2/1/2017
278I do think the American Public wants a genuine alternative from the Democratic PRarebird-2/1/2017
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News