P&S and STO Death Blow's | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends
P&S and STO Death Blow's

An SI Board Since May 2002

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
30712	215	0

Emcee: Jeff	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
30312	i feel your pain....you are just another toasted short with a short fuse these d	Jeff	-	7/2/2003
30311	The thing people seem to be missing is the risk. If anything, as an evil greedy	who cares?	-	7/2/2003
30310	You explained something to me? If you think that had nothing to do with what you	mongo-	-	7/2/2003
30309	7/2/03 Look at chart #4 Weekly It keeps on going and going. stockcharts.com La	TREND1	-	7/2/2003
30308	yup....and it means absolutely nothing in the real trading world of making money	Jeff	-	7/2/2003
30307	<<<and your comparison is true on face....>>> It certainly is	mongo-	-	7/2/2003
30306	to use 6 times the money to make the same gain and declare a victory is just non	Jeff	-	7/2/2003
30305	I conceded that and understand that and stated that. It does not change the fact	mongo-	-	7/2/2003
30304	sure....but the same number of shares would cost you 60 thousand dollars not 10	Jeff	-	7/2/2003
30303	Here are some interesting comments on treasuries versus stocks: A few paragraphs	t2	-	7/2/2003
30302	My example was just to show that if a stock acted as shown.....35 to 2.00....or	mongo-	-	7/2/2003
30301	t2, Wait for signs of sustained economic growth. That and that alone will start	Lone Ranger	-	7/2/2003
30300	I said going from .35 to 2.00 is the preferred way. But going short at 2.00 the	mongo-	-	7/2/2003
30299	<i>Where's the bigger bubble now? Bonds or equities.</i> It is	t2	-	7/2/2003
30298	you are flat out wrong......10k is 10k.....used long or short....because shorts	Jeff	-	7/2/2003
30297	>>> Obviously it is better to use less capital to make the same money,	chowder	-	7/2/2003
30296	Not making anything fit.....just another way of looking at it dollar for dollar.	mongo-	-	7/2/2003
30295	make it fit anyway you want if it makes you feel better.... but the example is	Jeff	-	7/2/2003
30294	Aside form the initial capital investment and the percentage gains, shorting a s	mongo-	-	7/2/2003
30293	yup....back a few months ago i couldn't believe the shorts on these threads	Jeff	-	7/2/2003
30292	You nailed it Jeff; Shorts dont know the math. They neither grasp the Supply dem	dvdw©	-	7/2/2003
30291	go ahead and short them......most you could do is 100%...and thats rare....longs	Jeff	-	7/2/2003
30290	Those crappers are going to be fun to short. I agree, those things could easily	jjstingray	-	7/2/2003
30289	i found a better way to play the EBAY steam roller..... its called the rising t	Jeff	-	7/2/2003
30288	Take EBAY; Has a Float of 244 million shares. I gave a buy recommendation at 55	dvdw©	-	7/2/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):