SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
TA-Quotes Plus
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
11149 121 0
Emcee:  Douglas Schneider Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3081 And here's a formula for the moving average of dahl -- one that allows you TechTrader42-1/15/1998
3080 Here it is: A much shortened formula for slope of dahl that allows you to put iTechTrader42-1/15/1998
3079 Bob: Got it! Just solved that unsexy Sxy problem: q:=0; for r=0 to -2 step -TechTrader42-1/15/1998
3078 Bob: Here is the "Sy" part of the dahl slope formula with the for looTechTrader42-1/15/1998
3077 Very good point: start using VER 1 now. Most would not even see the ver 2.0 resRichard Estes-1/15/1998
3076 HI Leo, Most of the scans now posted work with R2 only. Some could be back engMichael Quarne-1/15/1998
3075 It would be easy enough to use the for loop with the Sy line in the slope of DaTechTrader42-1/15/1998
3074 Yes, I thought about carriage returns about 15 minutes after I sent that note -TechTrader42-1/15/1998
3073 Was just answered--R2 lines end with ';'.Bob Jagow-1/15/1998
3072 A manual was distributed with the program early on... Thanks Bob. I haven'Tim Fierro-1/15/1998
3071 would someone please tell me if the scans showing up on this forum are supposedleo lewis-1/15/1998
3070 Tim, A manual was distributed with the program early on, but it was a little ouBob Jagow-1/15/1998
3069 Message wasn't complete--didn't think I sent that, Brooke. Seems SI noBob Jagow-1/15/1998
3068 This may sound weird, but IS/WAS there a manual with QP v 1.1? I have seen refTim Fierro-1/15/1998
3067 Brooke, You can shorten the code by stacking short expressions on one line. ForBob Jagow-1/15/1998
3066 I didn't try WOW, Brooke; don't have it installed at the moment. When IBob Jagow-1/15/1998
3065 Your formula is completely adaptable for Dahl, too. Below is a QP formula for tTechTrader42-1/15/1998
3064 I'm surprised that you say you need to redo the scan. With an 8:4 output, tTechTrader42-1/15/1998
3063 I'm beginning to realize that there are no final versions in this game, butTechTrader42-1/15/1998
3062 Paul and Bob again: Correction: BNGO's slope after tonight's download iTechTrader42-1/15/1998
3061 Thanks, but it's hardly a breakthrough, Paul--think the LS equations were kBob Jagow-1/14/1998
3060 Brooke; I'm not missing, I'm just dazzled. It's like watching OrcinTom Gibbs-1/14/1998
3059 Can't wait for final versions, hope we get them all at your website. Richard Estes-1/14/1998
3058 Jeff Grover found two nasty typos in my QP formulation of the BPS sell signal, TechTrader42-1/14/1998
3057 Paul and Bob: I've checked the values of Bob's QP slope formula with thTechTrader42-1/14/1998
3056 Craig, I see you and Brooke discussing the 3 dy. slope period, now that I'vChris G.-1/14/1998
3055 You wrote: Is your concept that of looking for a second (or third or fourth, Craig Monroe-1/14/1998
3054 Bob, Thanks for the warning. I know a breakthrough when I see one, and you cePaul Beattie-1/14/1998
3053 Craig, <i>What could I add to exclude the stocks selected by this code thPaul Beattie-1/14/1998
3052 I don't know when QP2 is finally going to be released. I don't think anTechTrader42-1/14/1998
3051 As I suspected and Thanks for your confirmation. I tried dropping " ; &qunestegg-1/14/1998
3050 Here's the sell signal for BPS (Brooke's Penurious System), translated TechTrader42-1/14/1998
3049 I guess I should have posted the formula for MSWIN 6.5 <b>Dahl's PriMichael Quarne-1/14/1998
3048 Second thoughts on this - The followup loop(-16,-120) is probably not what youCraig DeHaan-1/14/1998
3047 I don't know how many would make it thru this added filter, but take the ouCraig DeHaan-1/14/1998
3046 Yes, mostly c & p based on some concepts of Chan using LinRegSlope of "Craig DeHaan-1/14/1998
3045 <i>3 seemed to be the best in the buy signal</i> I concur. DonCraig DeHaan-1/14/1998
3044 Craig: I won't have to come up with a formula for standard deviation after TechTrader42-1/14/1998
3043 Here's "Dahl's Primary Trend" for WOW: mov(c,50,s) - ref(mov(TechTrader42-1/14/1998
3042 Craig: A 3-day slope is short term, but I tested lots of values for use with DaTechTrader42-1/14/1998
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News