SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
MEMC INT'L. (WFR -NYSE) The Sleeping Giant?
An SI Board Since January 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4697 59 0 WFR
Emcee:  ---------- Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3172 Maverick, the following article shows that you may not have to wait that long. Zeev Hed-3/21/1998
3171 Maverick, I wasn't talking about the stock, I was alluding to your thougBruce A. Thompson-3/21/1998
3170 2008 in two years? Must be that new math.... 2000 I'd have no problem witMaverick-3/21/1998
3169 Maverick, I'm 46 and I wish I had had an opportunity like this when I was Bruce A. Thompson-3/21/1998
3168 Don, with that timetable, I have to concede you're right. You are an unusuMaverick-3/20/1998
3167 Recent Inet commerce links: customnews.cnn.com customnews.cnn.com customnewsMaverick-3/20/1998
3166 >>Note this was posted well after my remarks: cbs.marketwatch.com. Donald B. Fuller-3/20/1998
3165 Very good points. Yes, your explanation is actually more accurate than mine, iMaverick-3/20/1998
3164 Maverick, the reason I am not plunging into internet commerce, is that I do notZeev Hed-3/20/1998
3163 Z, up until a couple months ago, I would have agreed with you. But things haveMaverick-3/20/1998
3162 Maverick, I have no argument with you over the next quarter or two, but the botZeev Hed-3/20/1998
3161 Note this was posted well after my remarks: cbs.marketwatch.com I'm am NOMaverick-3/20/1998
3160 D. and Z., you two have taken my comment way out of context. It had nothing toMaverick-3/20/1998
3159 (Off Topic) Re: "which DVD do you see as beaten down and interesting?"John Cuthbertson-3/20/1998
3158 Maverick, I think you are confusing the tail and the head of the dog. The "Zeev Hed-3/20/1998
3157 ** Off topic ** Scotsman, which DVD do you see as beaten down and interesting?Jim DuBois-3/20/1998
3156 >>The days of the semi's are over. It's the net now.>> I gDonald B. Fuller-3/20/1998
3155 Yep, looks pretty grim. But I still have to believe that somewhere down the linScotsman-3/19/1998
3154 More on Samsung/MEMC: Supposedly Samsung has over 50,000 (MEMC) wafers on handMaverick-3/19/1998
3153 A lot will depend upon what kind of investor you are. It looks like WFR is goinScotsman-3/19/1998
3152 Doug, you are right that O would rather miss few points than miss the boat, butZeev Hed-3/19/1998
3151 Zeev, 1) The price action has obviously been terrible lately. 2) We are closeDebt Free-3/19/1998
3150 Maverick, the 100 by the end of the year 2000 was thrown in anticipation of a SZeev Hed-3/19/1998
3149 That $100 by 2000 was a number that got thrown around long before the Asian disMaverick-3/19/1998
3148 I guess recover is a relative term. Since the market looks out about 6 months, Scotsman-3/19/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News