SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
CYRIX / NSM
An SI Board Since December 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
33344 34 0 NSM
Emcee:  Badshah J.Wazir Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
31744 Darren, biz.yahoo.com >>The Stack awards are presented each year to theDan B.-4/23/1999
31743 Paul, as Scumbria pointed out, NSM/Cyrix entered into this game two years ago. Dan B.-4/23/1999
31742 Josef - <Do you have a link some info about Timna?> Nope. I believe PauProcess Boy-4/23/1999
31741 Danby - Re: "On Monday, Compaq, Hewlett-Packard, and others will come out Paul Engel-4/23/1999
31740 Danby - Re: " I believe Intel is left off his list for now because it is nPaul Engel-4/23/1999
31739 Darren - Re: " Paul, your short on this one aren't you? <eom> Paul Engel-4/23/1999
31738 Darren...."If someone could introduce a computer that had all the basic fDan B.-4/23/1999
31737 "This is true, but there are huge advances to be made in CPU processing andarren_-4/23/1999
31736 Ok scumbria, thanks for clearing that up. I do agree with that, yet I'm thDan B.-4/23/1999
31735 Darren, <i> I honestly can't see most people spending more than $50 Scumbria-4/23/1999
31734 "People who want high performance systems will be using separate parts fordarren_-4/23/1999
31733 Dan, There are a few situations where integrating the system improves on perfoScumbria-4/23/1999
31732 Darren, I suspect they have several products in the 0.18 fab which will need cScumbria-4/23/1999
31731 RE:"There making something. I have a feeling that we will find out what itJim McMannis-4/23/1999
31730 Paul, your short on this one aren't you? <eom> darren_-4/23/1999
31729 Darren - Re: " i was getting at is that if you want to try and compete witPaul Engel-4/23/1999
31728 "Through many years in this industry I am not familiar with the concept ofdarren_-4/23/1999
31727 Thanks Joe. Makes sense. EOMDan B.-4/23/1999
31726 Dan I think the reason for 2 chip approach for a general purpose CPU is that oJoe NYC-4/23/1999
31725 Scumbria, Thanks for the replies. I gather..."Onboard graphics avoids tDan B.-4/23/1999
31724 Darren, <i> final silicon </i> Through many years in this industrScumbria-4/23/1999
31723 "From this angle, the report lends credence to the IBM rumors, especially darren_-4/23/1999
31722 Process Boy, <i>I will be curious to compare Timna to Cyrix performance/Joe NYC-4/23/1999
31721 Dan, PCOAC (Media PC?) will be one chip solution. But M3 (Jalapno) will have Joe NYC-4/23/1999
31720 Just curious if anybody finds this personnel move as odd as I do? biz.yahoo.coAB-4/23/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):