SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Interactive Network, Inc. *** INNN ***
An SI Board Since October 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
418 5 0 INNN
Emcee:  sylvan Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
318 Just noticed while checking quotes on Yahoo that there is now an "insider&dwight vickers-4/15/1999
317 Sounds like the voluntary Ch.11 is settled then. Thought something had to be udwight vickers-4/15/1999
316 Awesome... wish I hadn't sold a while back :) Good luck everyone... hope iGary Teichrow-4/14/1999
315 What do you guys think about this news? biz.yahoo.comMike Jafari-4/14/1999
314 Hi Scott, Way to be on top of things. It appears to only be a filing technicadwight vickers-4/9/1999
313 As I mentioned in post #293, it seems like there's a lot more here than jusJostacy O.-4/9/1999
312 New SEC filing converting TCI ownership to AT&T. Dwight you may want to loScott A. Trapp-4/9/1999
311 If it was 1/2, I might buy it all back. Ask right now is 11/16, or about 68 cedwight vickers-4/8/1999
310 If you really had guts <GGG> you would buy back 1/2 of what you sold hereGeorge Mc Geary-4/8/1999
309 Wish I had done more. Only sold about 10% there, sold others at .90 and .70. dwight vickers-4/8/1999
308 And so smart you were to get rid of a little of this at 1$ George Mc Geary-4/8/1999
307 So far we're holding support at the 50 cent breakout level, but it sure isdwight vickers-4/8/1999
306 I imagine it's the impatient momo players moving on. Any update on the meeJostacy O.-4/6/1999
305 Thanks George. It appears that they may be a T/A operation. Which makes sensedwight vickers-4/3/1999
304 Found this comment and thought I would share it since there is never any news tGeorge Mc Geary-4/3/1999
303 I agree. And may the intrinsic value of the patents cause a gap up in the mornJostacy O.-3/31/1999
302 Anything is possible. But there are so many momentum players today........ Thdwight vickers-3/31/1999
301 I'm figuring if buying is happening at this level on the day of the sharehoJostacy O.-3/31/1999
300 I actually sold (a little) at $1.00. Dwight (Did I mention---YEEEHAWWWW!!!!!!)dwight vickers-3/31/1999
299 Here! here! (or is it hear! hear!). Jostacy O.-3/31/1999
298 Come on some one has to post it. We hit $1 this is a great milestone. Scott Scott A. Trapp-3/31/1999
297 It is a quandary, isn't it? No one knows for sure what the patents are wordwight vickers-3/29/1999
296 Urgent buying - hopefully an indicator that patents are worth a whole lot more.Jostacy O.-3/29/1999
295 Last trade 87 cents. How about that!!! Dwight dwight vickers-3/29/1999
294 I guess anything is possible. To make a clean break I'd prefer to see a sadwight vickers-3/26/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News