SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
(LVLT) - Level 3 Communications
An SI Board Since January 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3873 120 0 LVLT
Emcee:  MangoBoy Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3198Their "#1 position"--by default you forgot to add--is vapor position jIngotWeTrust-6/26/2002
3197High Priority: Pull-Out. Pressure to stock will be removed. Status: satisfiedJames T.-6/26/2002
3196"If you are truly going to rant about "gaining market share"...anLeroyt-6/5/2002
3195Ditto.Frank A. Coluccio-6/5/2002
3194I hear there is a private thread here. I would like to be contacted.kjgarrison-6/5/2002
3193Your reply reminds me of the old observation: "who you trying to convince, IngotWeTrust-6/4/2002
3192gold, However the count is specifically made, LVLT has been gaining share for mLeroyt-6/4/2002
3191quotes: <i>The following 250 ISP's host the most servers on <b>tIngotWeTrust-6/3/2002
3190LVLT #1; New European business with Implosion of KPNQwest. Level 3 now is the #Leroyt-6/3/2002
3189Well, there are bigger fools out there than Jim. At least, he "can't&qLeroyt-5/31/2002
3188Jim Oberweiss, money fund manager of long reputation and duration, just DISPARAGIngotWeTrust-5/31/2002
3187Source?? I am decidely more upbeat on LVLT than others here. My cost is about cLeroyt-5/31/2002
3186I think I paid around 56 plus some accumulated interest, I don't recall exacDale Baker-5/30/2002
3185Dale - do you mind divulging what you paid and where the bonds are trading now? rrufff-5/30/2002
3184If the story doesn't improve by late this year I will probably take my SepteDale Baker-5/30/2002
3183Hi Dale, That bond play reminds me of a friend who was damn certain that LVLTRaymond Duray-5/30/2002
3182Beware of anyone speaking of LVLT and Buffet in the same breath...it was heavilyIngotWeTrust-5/29/2002
3181Thanks. I was aware of the bonds and may invest in them too. I'm only takikjgarrison-5/29/2002
3180Outstanding Investors Digest. A "value investing" oriented publicatiokjgarrison-5/29/2002
3179James T. How can an investor confirm the price information you report?kjgarrison-5/29/2002
3178If you want a safer way to play LVLT, look at the bonds now priced in the high 4Dale Baker-5/28/2002
3177A: What is OID? B: Now that you've asked, the private threader participants IngotWeTrust-5/27/2002
3176Three things: Has anybody seen the articles in OID re: lvlt? Any thoughts? Hokjgarrison-5/27/2002
3175Well, you can't blame them...they gotta pay for those cost over-runs and offIngotWeTrust-5/24/2002
3174Latest on L3 prices: 330% to 3200% higher than their competition - straight fromJames T.-5/24/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News