SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
PSFT - Fiscal 1998 - Discussion for the next year
An SI Board Since February 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4509 28 0 PSFT
Emcee:  Raptor Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3209 Tom, since Melissa is one of my favorite posters on this thread, and she specifChuzzlewit-10/23/1998
3208 Oh no you don't... Nope. You can't carry on Tom_-10/23/1998
3207 Hi, Mel .. as you know, I think this chart reading seems like so much jiggery Raptor-10/23/1998
3206 gc, Look at a weekly chart for the weeks ending 4/4, 4/11 and 4/18 of last yeaMelissa McAuliffe-10/23/1998
3205 BTW, 17 is NOT a support level. gc-10/23/1998
3204 You have to understand that ANY statements on the thread (given by bear or bullgc-10/23/1998
3203 gc, I saw the support slightly above 15, however there is support above that lMelissa McAuliffe-10/23/1998
3202 Different people looking at the same chart may have different conclusion. Basicgc-10/23/1998
3201 I completely agree that the Y2K mania is being used as a convenient explanationRick-10/23/1998
3200 gc, Could you please help me out in my chart reading and explain what you see Melissa McAuliffe-10/23/1998
3199 The chart indicates the stock may fall below 15 in near term. Not time to "gc-10/23/1998
3198 Tomabre, thanks for Your explanation about tax loss selling. Last Year most loLutz Moeller-10/23/1998
3197 Michelle, that is exactly what happens in most cases, and it is done for tax reChuzzlewit-10/23/1998
3196 Well I'm on a roll here about this y2k thing. Why don't they just REALMelissa McAuliffe-10/22/1998
3195 This is why I have a problem with a lot of these analysts. They can only parroMelissa McAuliffe-10/22/1998
3194 Michelle, As usual, we are in total agreement. One day we'll have to disagMelissa McAuliffe-10/22/1998
3193 if IT budget was affected by y2k, then dell, intc, cpq, msft, csco should all bgc-10/22/1998
3192 <i>I have felt for some time now that this y2k issue is the new excuse thLizzie Tudor-10/22/1998
3191 I think I read this to say that Y2K issues are not a significant factor in speMelissa McAuliffe-10/22/1998
3190 This could provide some insight to the uncertainty surrounding Enterprise Apps hash-10/22/1998
3189 Ratlong,<< SAP has an installed base in 460 of the Fortune 500>> Melissa McAuliffe-10/22/1998
3188 With all the downgrades and the 25%-35% growth specified by management , I haveMario-10/22/1998
3187 If you are an institutional client, you may have special treatment. Otherwise, gc-10/22/1998
3186 Michelle, All in all, a strong "market" analysis- which is the type Iratlong-10/22/1998
3185 Mercury Interactive... MERQ Automated software quality product that reduces thratlong-10/22/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News