SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Silicon Investor ThinkTank
An SI Board Since November 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3372 100 0
Emcee:  Scott Lux Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3222it appears to be the work of yet another whiney-ass liberal... can i say whineMulhollandDrive-1/22/2003
3221It is despicable to punish someone who actually belongs on the GWB thread, and nsandintoes-1/22/2003
3220Someone obviously complained about that post to Jeff. Don't you find it tellCarolyn-1/22/2003
3219apparently it is ok to call jla a "defender of child molesters" or toMulhollandDrive-1/22/2003
3218Did you direct this post to Jeff?Carolyn-1/22/2003
3217Jeff, I heard that jlallen was suspended for calling another SIer an unpatrioticCarolyn-1/22/2003
3216Shootie, did this guy ever get suspended? What he said to you is far worse than Bill-1/22/2003
3215I just heard that jlallen was suspended for using a derogatory phase about the wBill-1/22/2003
3214I had heard the rumor that Ray,.... can I call him Ray?... fit the general ideShoot1st-1/22/2003
3213In regards to this post - Message 18474156 I would just like to add that people JakeStraw-1/22/2003
3212Hi John, what's up with the search? I go to this thread #subject-52739, typAugustWest-12/2/2002
3211There should be only one "Notes"! It's not like a new thread is ssandintoes-10/30/2002
3210If that were true, we'd have to shut down Congress and all state legislatureLazarus_Long-10/27/2002
3209It seems that the answer is that there is no longer (if there ever was) a religiE-10/27/2002
3208It will probably never happen but I would love it if there was an ignore option TimF-10/24/2002
3207It would require a REALLY BIG DISCLAIMER, that's for sure. On the other topQuahog-10/24/2002
3206LOL. And to keep moving? I guess there's no legal-issues thread.E-10/24/2002
3205<i>>>Or just one frequented by a lot of lawyers? </i> Find anDavid Lawrence-10/24/2002
3204We try not to congregate in groups. <gg> But, I think you might be talkinQuahog-10/24/2002
3203Does anyone know whether there's a chat thread on SI on which legal matters E-10/24/2002
3202No doubt. I dub those LAGs Lame ass grubs. But it was there What more can I sAugustWest-10/9/2002
3201That wasn't worth getting out of bed for. (Kindly excuse my poor grammar!)David Lawrence-10/9/2002
3200Morning David. Just slipping in here for some morning grub.AugustWest-10/9/2002
3199Hi John. Just so you don't think I'm a complete unappreciative bastard, AugustWest-10/9/2002
3198Is not the name of this thread an oxymoron?Sir Auric Goldfinger-10/1/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News