SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
CYRIX / NSM
An SI Board Since December 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
33344 34 0 NSM
Emcee:  Badshah J.Wazir Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
32244 Craig, Where did you hear that the Portland fab and TSMC use incompatible procPravin Kamdar-5/12/1999
32243 <i>TSMC said the reason they didn't want Portland was that it was usiFJB-5/12/1999
32242 Pravin, I guess all the NSM detractors are in denial. Did they miss the PR todSaltheart-5/12/1999
32241 Pravin, I agree that STM would be the logical buyer for CYRX's core design Craig Freeman-5/12/1999
32240 George, should we be shorting Kodak, Fuji, Canon, etc.?zebraspot-5/12/1999
32239 Pravin, TSMC said the reason they didn't want Portland was that it was usiCraig Freeman-5/12/1999
32238 Craig, Looking into my Crystal ball, I further predict that the Cyrix processoPravin Kamdar-5/12/1999
32237 Craig, I see National selling a majority stake in the fab to TSMC with a stratPravin Kamdar-5/12/1999
32236 Craig, Why not.. a netowrk design team put themselves up for sale on there ;) Steve Porter-5/12/1999
32235 Steve, re: "National should put the whole thing on buy.com or something.&qCraig Freeman-5/12/1999
32234 Pravin, re: "You might be surprised. You might see National with the benefCraig Freeman-5/12/1999
32233 Not sure if this has been mentioned in the other articles on the AOL deal, but AB-5/12/1999
32232 Saltheart, Things are beginning to fall into place. It's not too late to gPravin Kamdar-5/12/1999
32231 Steve, May not be easy but looks like we may have a deal in the making... quoSaltheart-5/12/1999
32230 RE:"But the upload speed is limited by the POTS to a meager 53K. &quoJim McMannis-5/12/1999
32229 There's an 8 year old kid on eBay that is willing to put up $600M for the PJimmy Liao-5/12/1999
32228 Craig, WEll the problem is, a fab plant is not something that is easy to sell Steve Porter-5/12/1999
32227 Cyrix MPU To Power Set-Top Box For AOL TV Venture (05/11/99, 4:36 p.m. ET) By SKent Rattey-5/12/1999
32226 Pravin, It's nice to see somebody actually read the press on the subject- Dan B.-5/12/1999
32225 Craig, re: TSM has said publicly that they don't want Portland... Really.Pravin Kamdar-5/12/1999
32224 Kash, re: "The key for AOL is ADSL as they are leveraged out of the Cable Craig Freeman-5/12/1999
32223 Craig, Re: AOL deal This deal is extremely questionable IMHO. Apparently youkash johal-5/11/1999
32222 Steve, given today's somewhat muted response to the formal AOL announcementCraig Freeman-5/11/1999
32221 Jim, It's only going up because for once I sold it at a profit ;) Steve Steve Porter-5/11/1999
32220 Pravin, I'm amazed. NSM gets out of the CPU business and the stock goes up.Jim McMannis-5/11/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News