SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Barrick Gold (ABX)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3558 49 0 ABX
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3233You would think this "expert" would try to dispel doubts by answering tyc:>-1/3/2003
3232Interesting -- "Investors—and gold investors, in particular—have for monthsDundee Maples-1/3/2003
3231Enigma, You present some very good arguments and as all of you are more astute tloantech-1/2/2003
3230I don't mean that Barrick won't surpass the others and that it is probabEnigma-1/2/2003
3229If you think that the truth never catches up with a lie, and if you think that tTommaso-1/2/2003
3228That's your choice and the choice of a lot of others. But your assertion isEnigma-1/2/2003
3227Paranoia is to imagine that a few people on what is for most investors a totallyTommaso-1/2/2003
3226Nickle61 and some others of the paranoid persuasion have had a forum here - not Enigma-1/2/2003
3225You are correct. For newcomers, the most prolific of these contrarians was nickeFuzzFace-1/1/2003
3224I think about a year ago various people were trying to point out on this thread Tommaso-1/1/2003
3223not sure anyone owes you an explanation for stock performance. but you could deEnigma-1/1/2003
3222You are correct I have not received a response from Barrick. It is interesting Dundee Maples-12/31/2002
3221Ken I agree but Russett and a few others now incl. Liz will disagree. I know lesloantech-12/25/2002
3220Don't expect an answer. Barrick's allegiance has been, will be, and wilKen Benes-12/25/2002
3219Just a note I sent to Barrick. Maybe other folks should be asking them this queDundee Maples-12/18/2002
3218It's going to be interesting to watch the stress test of Barrick's hedgeThe Barracuda™-12/18/2002
3217I would say the extreme gold nuts have finally given Barrick something they can russet-12/18/2002
3216Oh look at this, Barrick is going to fight. Munk must be fuming ;) biz.yahoo.coBruce Robbins-12/18/2002
3215biz.yahoo.com <I>Another mining analyst, Chad Williams of Westwind PartneBruce Robbins-12/18/2002
3214Sounds like sour grapes to me. I did get a good laugh from the following quote, David Lawrence-12/18/2002
3213I am waiting to hear Enigma's reply to this article. KenKen Benes-12/18/2002
3212And of course, Barrick is the only gold that is down today 1%. All the rest are Bruce Robbins-12/18/2002
3211DECEMBER 18, 2002 - 13:25 EST Barrick Gold Corp. And J.P. Morgan Chase & Corusset-12/18/2002
3210I figured on pretty much the same thing as you regarding Barrick but it is nice Bruce Robbins-12/16/2002
3209In my opinion, and in Barrick's (from their public statements), they will dorusset-12/16/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News