SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Tyco International Limited (TYC)
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3770 100 0 TYC
Emcee:  Terrapin Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3245Somehow Tyco has the feel and flavor of Rite-Aid to me. When that stock was goigeoffrey Wren-4/29/2002
3244Sellers very much in control now. I've been making more buys this morningPaul Senior-4/29/2002
3243What a moronic post...you're losing your ass, I'm taking your money, so Tatnic-4/29/2002
3242blankmind, RE: <i>crawford, if cit nets tyco no more than $3 bill, I'GVTucker-4/29/2002
3241You are 100% wrong about any Chapter 11 stuff re TYC. There is no analogy whatsRGM-4/29/2002
3240<<triple b rating is not junk? Well, I get your point, maybe not for tyc. Z Analyzer-4/28/2002
3239Rob, CIT is an abortion gone really bad for TYC, they never did understand whatgladman-4/28/2002
3238Hey it doesn't matter really. This is the equivalent of a yard sale, pure anTatnic-4/28/2002
3237I think the $23B of net debt is accurate. (industrial debt less cash) What I wJimieA-4/28/2002
3236Is "the roughly $23 billion of net debt" a reliable number?Sr K-4/28/2002
3235If TYC only paid a couple of billion to much for CIT, they might as well keep itSkeet Shipman-4/28/2002
3234<i>but a bruised ego is a small price to pay for better governance.</i&Yogizuna-4/28/2002
3233The Board A ban on stock sales by directors for the duration of their terms wouislug-4/28/2002
3232Ignore him . He's been making dumb remarks about TYCO forever.SPSEIFERT-4/28/2002
3231crawford, if cit nets tyco no more than $3 bill, I'll stick strictly to mutublankmind-4/28/2002
3230No Crawford 3B is not junk unless you are a basher of the Co. and have to hang ySPSEIFERT-4/28/2002
3229triple b rating is not junk? Well, I get your point, maybe not for tyc. It'sTatnic-4/28/2002
3228Glad to see there's someone on this board who isn't a mindless basher. IZ Analyzer-4/28/2002
3227after listening to confer call & going thru finl's: - bottom line: w/ blankmind-4/27/2002
3226- rich, okay - if they were winding up ongoing acquisitions - & got Paragon blankmind-4/27/2002
3225In TYCOs ADT business there are two sale channels. One is direct and the other irich evans-4/27/2002
3224Per 10Q release: "The Company paid $1.45 billion in cash for acquisitions iblankmind-4/27/2002
3223deeno - you're correct - in hindsight - if tyc's stock remains at these blankmind-4/27/2002
3222anyone - i'm at a loss to explain the low p/e given to CIT. Given that all tblankmind-4/27/2002
3221From UBS PaineWebber: We maintain a Strong Buy rating on Tyco Although Tyco’s sshoe-4/27/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News