SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Spansion Inc.
An SI Board Since December 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4590 24 0 CY
Emcee:  TimF Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3265Rink, <i>Intel + Micron develop high speed NAND</i> The Inquirer mJoe NYC-2/1/2008
3264Intel + Micron develop high speed NAND: theinquirer.net 200MB/s read, 100MB/s wRink-2/1/2008
3263Looks like the shorts walking down the price on small volume and someone buying Plissken-1/31/2008
3262<i>Some strange short volume/price spikes today!</i> do you think smuzosi-1/31/2008
3261Some strange short volume/price spikes today! <img src='http://www.stud.BUGGI-WO-1/31/2008
3260I've being trying to figure out the market for Spansions high density produccaptainfreedom-1/31/2008
3259Nokia outpaces handset market: eetimes.combobs10-1/31/2008
3258you: I have ample funds available to play this game as long as the shorts givebobs10-1/31/2008
3257Hi bobs10, I always enjoy reading your posts. Some food for thought as we deal ELH1006-1/31/2008
3256Ok, this is an article by Ben Stein, one of the few people in the financial worlbobs10-1/30/2008
3255Background info: SMIC to put up 200mm, 300mm fabs in Shenzhen. It will use IBM&#Rink-1/30/2008
3254The write-off therory sounds possible. No company has made profit in NOR since 2captainfreedom-1/30/2008
3253Ok, short interest as of the 15th was about 19m shares. That figure should be dbobs10-1/30/2008
3252<i>Pam, Would it be correct to conclude your perspective on Spansion softePam-1/30/2008
3251Ok, from my point of view here's what's going on. First, were rapidly lebobs10-1/30/2008
3250Pam, Would it be correct to conclude your perspective on Spansion softened a bitRink-1/30/2008
3249Joe, I just had to think about one of your earlier posts: Saifun (end 2006): &lRink-1/30/2008
3248Joe, sorry. I overlooked it and saw it too late. (eom)Rink-1/30/2008
3247Would Samsung or Toshiba have any anti-trust problem with trying to purchase SpaPetz-1/29/2008
3246NicoV, <i>Since Spansion market capitalisation is only $500M now, I fail Joe NYC-1/29/2008
3245Since Spansion market capitalisation is only $500M now, I fail to see how an IPONicoV-1/29/2008
3244Keith, <i>if I compare your 2 years+ to SPSN´s timeline with SP1, itJoe NYC-1/29/2008
3243Joe, if I compare your 2 years+ to SPSN´s timeline with SP1, it looks more KeithDust2000-1/29/2008
3242Keith, To that article (and general intention of Numonyx to equip M6), my replyJoe NYC-1/29/2008
3241<i>Unless > 2 b/c can be produced at latest node, the answer is that itPam-1/29/2008
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):