SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Barrick Gold (ABX)
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3558 49 0 ABX
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3308Liz you seem on edge.<g> Maybe I better forward a bottle of decent red. I loantech-1/16/2003
3307And the profits will be big. I heard some guy try to compare McEwan to Munk the Bruce Robbins-1/16/2003
3306It will be 15% soon. These guys are not stupid. The street is.Elizabeth Andrews-1/16/2003
3305Those stocks are not even close to the same league as this discussion concerns. Elizabeth Andrews-1/16/2003
3304Yes I'm also disappointed that you have no idea of what I speak. I'm sorElizabeth Andrews-1/16/2003
3303Russsett made a brilliant post. But let's watch the stock price. We have seeloantech-1/16/2003
3302The interesting things is as russett pointed out only 20% of ABXs reserves are hBruce Robbins-1/16/2003
3301I am sticking with CKG and YMU.<g> If I want a stock like ABX I do want CBloantech-1/16/2003
3300There, there!Enigma-1/16/2003
3299I'll bet ABX will surprise a few people this year when they hit the mark andBruce Robbins-1/16/2003
3298Thanks, Russett, that is a pile of information and analysis to digest but I willTommaso-1/16/2003
3297Lot of arguing going on. The proof sometime is in the stock prices. At least thaloantech-1/16/2003
3296Elizabeth, you are a disappointment. I no longer think you know what you are taTommaso-1/16/2003
3295ROTFLMAO! The analysts in Canada at the major brokerages (CIBC in particular) haBruce Robbins-1/16/2003
3294Arbitrage plays are created over and over again by fund managers who behave likeElizabeth Andrews-1/16/2003
3293You are missing the point. There's no leverage in having cash or gold as curElizabeth Andrews-1/16/2003
3292<b>This assumes that the cost of production will not rise. But if there isrusset-1/16/2003
3291You know, you are very good at presenting the negative side. Would you mind explTommaso-1/16/2003
3290Owning a gold producer in a rising gold price environment with a lot of debt is Elizabeth Andrews-1/16/2003
3289It was not my intention to persuade you to buy Barrick - but I stand by my conteEnigma-1/16/2003
3288>>>inflation will have little effect on the cost/ounce<<<Tommaso-1/16/2003
3287You're wasting time waiting IMO. People will become aware that Barrick is nEnigma-1/16/2003
3286Barrick has been such a laggard that I am now willing to consider buying into itTommaso-1/16/2003
3285A great find ! I had checked Barrick's annual report for a definition of &qutyc:>-1/10/2003
3284Barrick has a pretty good description of their hedging on the website now <i&russet-1/10/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):