SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
The Critical Investing Workshop
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
35685 103 0
Emcee:  Uncle Frank Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
34735<I>unscrupulous back stabbing vermin</I> Welcome back, Tim. I see Poet-3/11/2001
34734Yes, Poet ... interesting place and people, no doubt about that. I just returnebonnuss_in_austin-3/11/2001
34733Hi Poet, I too share your concerns regarding this concerted attack that has storobwin-3/11/2001
34732Hi Bonnie, I've seen, in the past few days since you've returned to SI,Poet-3/11/2001
34731jpgill, It's best to have a selective memory when one chooses to resort to Sully--3/11/2001
34730You have to read the balance sheet itself, I found these data in th last 10Q (EdZeev Hed-3/11/2001
34729Hi Zeev, Sorry to bother you, but where did you find this: <<of the $25 jjeannie-3/11/2001
34728Keith, NEWP is rapidly getting to twice book value (which is 75% cash), can you Zeev Hed-3/11/2001
34727LOLim a survivor-3/11/2001
34726Nope....NEWP too risky for me at this time....I like the company in a bull markeim a survivor-3/11/2001
34725The thread should be renamed "Love Put on Ignore" and get on with it. Annette-3/10/2001
34724KG4: There IS 'investing discussion' going on here ... to wit: NEWP fbonnuss_in_austin-3/10/2001
34723The thread header over here says "critical investing workshop" Is thaim a survivor-3/10/2001
34722Bonnuss, When exactly did you turn on your dear friend Voltaire? Message 13922Cactus Jack-3/10/2001
34721<<Have you ever eaten one deep fried in tempura?>> LOL! Too funny,bonnuss_in_austin-3/9/2001
34720Indeed, "Ying Yang," as the almighty father refers to you ... <snibonnuss_in_austin-3/9/2001
34719Well bonnie was one of the first, and I hate to diminish any of her glory, but YlangYlangBreeze13/9/2001
34718Gee the the bottom was in. Probably the angels said so. So were these angels wroYlangYlangBreeze-3/9/2001
34717Yes Rotund One, you are correct, remember, my angels get the last laugh. Now gVoltaire-3/9/2001
34716NEWP: 34 7/8. RMBS: 38 1/2. hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha 'b-i-a' ###bonnuss_in_austin-3/9/2001
34715Rosie: I know what you mean. However, your business is doing well, ... correcbonnuss_in_austin-3/9/2001
34714<I>so much for 'putting in bottoms</I> This is beginning to freabuelita-3/9/2001
34713Hi, Thomas! LOL: I believe the problem is depth of field which renders said subonnuss_in_austin-3/9/2001
34712Hi Bonnie, Big thanks to Rosie for posting that picture and clearing up yet anoNoneyet-3/9/2001
34711Hi volty my man, I think Bonnie was to the first to figure out that you are a CNoneyet-3/9/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News