SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
SDL, Inc. [Nasdaq: SDLI]
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3951 68 0 SDLI
Emcee:  pat mudge Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3601<i>Then came some info on this board that the JDSU merger was equal to aboGerald Walls-12/6/2000
3600Thanks for the info.tcd-12/6/2000
3599The ratio between JDSU and SDLI will be 3.8 when the merger is finalized. Untilpat mudge-12/6/2000
3598I have a question about SDLI - perhaps one of you can help me out. It seems thatcd-12/6/2000
3597RHK numbers on DWM/SDH in Asia Pacific: lightreading.com <i>According to pat mudge-12/6/2000
3596<i>I never see anyone criticizing the scumbag lawyers who jump on the lawspat mudge-12/5/2000
3595OT...opinions about Gilder aside...why does everyone jump on these lawsuits. Thcoach4def-12/5/2000
3594One more, this time on VCs and current valuations: interactive.wsj.com@2.cgi?mfpat mudge-12/5/2000
3593AT&T gets China contract. Bring on the band<i>width</i>. . . tpat mudge-12/5/2000
3592A good article for those who wonder where the core ends and the edge begins: fibpat mudge-12/5/2000
3591Ok, let's not be too rough with Gilder. He DOES think JDSU is about the 2nd 16yearcycle-12/4/2000
3590OT -- If you look at Xcelera.Com's history, it's not too surprising to pat mudge-12/4/2000
3589Gilder OT: Dogs and fleas come to mind...OWN STOCK-12/4/2000
3588OT-More trouble for another Gilder tout: Investors Sue Xcelera.Com Chairman, ChWyätt Gwyön-12/4/2000
3587LOL! I think you're right. That sounds like the co. Gilder thought was goingWyätt Gwyön-12/4/2000
3586<i>09:07 ET SDL Inc (SDLI) 201 63/64: Enters two-year agreement to supply pat mudge-12/4/2000
358509:07 ET SDL Inc (SDLI) 201 63/64: Enters two-year agreement to supply high voluWyätt Gwyön-12/4/2000
3584<i>obviously you do what you gotta do, but I think January will see a subsJoe Giorgianni-12/2/2000
3583Joe, obviously you do what you gotta do, but I think January will see a substantDiB-12/1/2000
3582OT -- Right after GG. I'll have to do something about that. :) Patpat mudge-12/1/2000
3581Congrats to Pat--number 11 on The List... Message 14918235Wyätt Gwyön-11/30/2000
3580<i>Joe, I bought SDLI at 243. I'm neither selling nor buying. SDLI at Joe Giorgianni-11/30/2000
3579Joe, I bought SDLI at 243. I'm neither selling nor buying. SDLI at 243 = JDSDiB-11/30/2000
3578You might want to learn about puts. Here is a good starting point: cboe.comWyätt Gwyön-11/30/2000
3577Let's just say that somebody had bought some SDLI at 250 and couldn't imJoe Giorgianni-11/30/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News