SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Business Wire Falls for April Fools Prank, Sues FBNers
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3795 39 0
Emcee:  EL KABONG!!! Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3645 Well no one I know really expects this zebra to change it's stripes. <g&s martin-12/9/1999
3644 >>>BTW, by failing to mention that this lawsuit came about because of TopCat-12/9/1999
3643 "They can't possibly research them all, and I don't see why they ss martin-12/9/1999
3642 You're very welcome. Wish I could have done more. The Philosopher-12/9/1999
3641 <i>Is it possible that they never really understood? Can they be that dumThe Philosopher-12/9/1999
3640 Looks like false or misleading statements in there to me. Under his new policyThe Philosopher-12/9/1999
3639 Congratulations, Lady and Gentlemen. (You too, Bill!) Perseverence has paid inDavid Lawrence-12/8/1999
3638 <i>$100K is not a big deal to BW, and I doubt Lokey lost any sleep over tJeffrey S. Mitchell-12/8/1999
3637 Sure the Three lost sleep, but Lokey lost face. And credibility. Not to belittlmarcos-12/8/1999
3636 <i>So, here we have a situation where we the defendants were totally andPeter V-12/8/1999
3635 It's interesting that BW's press release still mentions the bogus claiKen D-12/8/1999
3634 They will win as well. These crims never respond to interrogatories, they are lSir Auric Goldfinger-12/8/1999
3633 roflmao!! okay.. good idea :) jimJim B-12/8/1999
3632 <i>I cannot comprehend why, in this day and age, BW has left such a wide Janice Shell-12/8/1999
3631 <i>I'm sorry, but I don't think this was a victory for the WebnodMark Marcellus-12/8/1999
3630 A particularly warm thanks to Christopher Hodgkin and Peter V, who offered theiBill Ulrich-12/8/1999
3629 Yes, Mr. Lokey indeed has an <i>interesting</i> interpretation of tBill Ulrich-12/8/1999
3628 Something else that's funny: if you read the whole settlement agreement (aJanice Shell-12/7/1999
3627 Hey, don't forget the HITT Five. Janice Shell-12/7/1999
3626 Disingenuous ? <b>Graystone-12/7/1999
3625 <i>...if you could do it over again, would you guys have still done it?&lJanice Shell-12/7/1999
3624 This is an outrageous and pompous lie.... <i>Business Wire's Mr. LokMichelino-12/7/1999
3623 Note that once again Bizwire "forgot" to mention that Webnode was an Janice Shell-12/7/1999
3622 Good for you, Jeff....Janice....and Bill. Glad it worked out. --PatPatrick Slevin-12/7/1999
3621 Pete, Well said. People need to view everything in context. For example, in thJeffrey S. Mitchell-12/7/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):