SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Why is Gore Trying to Steal the Presidency?
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3887 2 0
Emcee:  Proud_Infidel Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3662<i>Anybody seen Street? </i> Its not my day to keep up with him.Cola Can-12/10/2000
3661You're kidding! Boies stood there and practically lectured to the USSC on naCarolyn-12/10/2000
3660I think they want to put forward their best whiner.I just love the whining he puhonjohn007-12/10/2000
3659Anybody seen Street? He's going to come back soon and give us the evidence E-12/10/2000
3658<i>. Do you now believe that Christ was just like Krishna? I'll bet noCola Can-12/10/2000
3657<i>FLORIDA LAW DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR AN EQUAL STATEWIDE STANDARD. How can tBarney-12/10/2000
3656Hilarious. I await your evidence that the claim you made here as factual is noE-12/10/2000
3655Dave, Dave........Dave......Dave: <i> FLORIDA LAW DOES NOT PROVIDE FOR AN The Duke of URL©-12/10/2000
3654What? No. I'm a woman. But even if I were a guy, and bald, it seems to, uh,E-12/10/2000
3653<<<Did you read about Share International? The guy SAYS HE IS CHRE-12/10/2000
3652Oh my, are you bald?The Street-12/10/2000
3651Then they are not communists. E, I really do not care to debate with someone whThe Street-12/10/2000
3650deletedProud_Infidel-12/10/2000
3649Brian, the plain fact is that the U.S. Supreme Court did not follow Florida Law Dave Gore-12/10/2000
3648Fox News is reporting that Boies will argue before USSC. Strange isn't it Proud_Infidel-12/10/2000
3647I answered that question. It's an ignorant contention. Not even the one commE-12/10/2000
3646<i>What went wrong? </i> Did you happen to see what the Chief JustProud_Infidel-12/10/2000
3645Excellent article; Thanks. I especially liked: So the next time some imbecilesProud_Infidel-12/10/2000
3644Your list of the similarities between Clinton and Hitler left off that they bothE-12/10/2000
3643On the U.S. Supreme Court's Outrageous Decision - my thoughts in words. <Dave Gore-12/10/2000
3642YOU CALL THIS AN ELECTION? by Heshy WalfiDavid Alon-12/10/2000
3641<b>The last resort of a scoundrel</b> ----------------------------jmhollen-12/10/2000
3640Thanks for the complement Bone Head.honjohn007-12/10/2000
3639Gore Calls For Recount Of Supreme Court Vote WASHINGTON, DC-- An increasingly dProud_Infidel-12/10/2000
3638Vey well thought out post. LOL There are surely Republicans, just as there areProud_Infidel-12/10/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):