The Case for Nuclear Energy | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
The Case for Nuclear Energy

An SI Board Since January 2001

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
312	21	0

Emcee: Hawkmoon	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
37	Even the dairy farmers are feeling the wrath of California's misguided energ	Hawkmoon	-	1/19/2001
36	January 16, 2001 California and Arizona: Contrasting Approaches to Electric Po	Hawkmoon	-	1/19/2001
35	Message 15201413 Re: Rolling Blackouts - You Ain't Seen by: larstrader 01	Hawkmoon	-	1/19/2001
34	Since so many people seem to think Nuclear power is so dangerous, I thought I mi	Hawkmoon	-	1/18/2001
33	>>But Cap'n, without a reliable source o' dilithium crystals, how	Snowshoe	-	1/17/2001
32	Hey Snow... had an interesting discussion this afternoon with an analyst from DO	Hawkmoon	-	1/16/2001
31	<i>all the brainwashed tree-huggers who grew up in the 60's, 70's,	Hawkmoon	-	1/16/2001
30	Wow - that's pretty wild. Sounds fairly speculative. How about this - it a	Tom Clarke	-	1/16/2001
29	I think that one of the more ironic aspects of nuclear energy is the fact that i	Conan	-	1/16/2001
28	Iwould suggest that you NEVER say NEVER	Stephen O	-	1/16/2001
27	But Cap'n, without a reliable source o' dilithium crystals, how do ye pr	CVJ	-	1/16/2001
26	NUCLEAR POWER NEARS PEAK As the 20th Anniversary of Three Mile Island Approache	Snowshoe	-	1/16/2001
25	>>One Nuclear plant will bring online 2000 MW of power, or 12-15 BILLION K	Snowshoe	-	1/16/2001
24	Cool link on Anti-matter!! That's what we're shooting for down the line	Hawkmoon	-	1/15/2001
23	<i>This is a useless comparison because a nuke plant costs much more than	Hawkmoon	-	1/15/2001
22	<i>Even though you may feel it is safe, a significant section of the gener	Hawkmoon	-	1/15/2001
21	>>It seems so fantastic, I can't imagine it happening. But somewhere,	Snowshoe	-	1/15/2001
20	Hi Ron, Very interesting topic to me. The following article may indicate a dev	CVJ	-	1/15/2001
19	This is what I like about some of these more technically inclined Sci-Fi writers	Hawkmoon	-	1/15/2001
18	>>In contrast to this, only a couple of nuclear plants account for 16% of	Snowshoe	-	1/15/2001
17	Jerry Pournelle is another sci-fi author who has written extensively on nuclear	Tom Clarke	-	1/15/2001
16	>>But even with a 1 megawatt-hour wind turbine, you'd need 2,500 of th	Snowshoe	-	1/15/2001
15	Don't get me wrong... I'm certainly not as against wind power as I am wi	Hawkmoon	-	1/15/2001
14	>>As for windmills, how come the enviromentalists aren't all up in arm	Snowshoe	-	1/15/2001
13	<i>It stated that there was more radiation put into the atmosphere from bu	Hawkmoon	-	1/14/2001

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):