SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Oak Technology (OAKT)
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4335 22 0 OAKT
Emcee:  Clam Clam Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3710 Hi Andy: Andy Chu on Dec 5 1997 5:27PM EST said: >>Oak's Warp5 will Bonzo-12/5/1997
3709 Andy,I for one don't see Dvd becoming a big deal until it is priced as a coMichael H. Dragon-12/5/1997
3708 No, they had all the chipsets then make and were showing them running 3D graphiWTSherman-12/5/1997
3707 <So, if things truely look so good for the future, why did it go down again?WTSherman-12/5/1997
3706 Cymeed, Oak's Warp5 will face lots of competitions from 3Dfx, Nivida, ATI.AreWeThereYet-12/5/1997
3705 GWM, thanks for the input. It will be interesting to see if this stock can rebSparky65-12/5/1997
3704 Andy, one thing I noticed from their past releases was, OAKT had a superior 3D Cymeed-12/5/1997
3703 Finally, I saw some serious buying during the past week and especially today. AreWeThereYet-12/5/1997
3702 By appointment only? Does that mean they had nothing to show?Carmine Cammarosano-12/5/1997
3701biz.yahoo.com aCAreWeThereYet-12/5/1997
3700 Sparky, I am pretty familiar with OAKT, don't work for them or anything ...WTSherman-12/5/1997
3699 GWM, you appear to know Oakt faily well. Is this true? If so, are you in the Sparky65-12/5/1997
3698 Another company in this sector (3Dfx) just pre-announced strong results for theDan Spillane-12/4/1997
3697 They weren't on the floor at COMDEX(never are), but, had one of the big rooWTSherman-12/4/1997
3696 I have been used it for reference number of time and here it is... biz.yahoo.coAreWeThereYet-12/4/1997
3695 >> Is it the potential law suit, obsolete products that will drive >BMC-12/4/1997
3694 Lindsey, I too wonder about this...but, I follow the industry pretty closely anWTSherman-12/4/1997
3693 The last two years there has definitely been a seasonal pop in Jan. check out tgregor-12/3/1997
3692 GWM, I personally think that Oakt is a good buy at this point. I do believe thSparky65-12/3/1997
3691 GWM, your rational for buying this stock is very inspiring. But as the wise oneLindsey R. Spencer-12/3/1997
3690 OAKT is getting to the point that it becomes an impossible to resist buy...anytWTSherman-12/3/1997
3689 To keep the thread alive... yahoo.com aCAreWeThereYet-12/2/1997
3688 Sounds good. If I can free up some money, I will look into this. Actually thisJ.S.-12/1/1997
3687 J.S. My assumption is based on the idea that "$7-8 is closed to the bottoAreWeThereYet-12/1/1997
3686 Ac Not true. If OAKT dips to about 7.5 (even for a long time) you will not haJ.S.-12/1/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News