SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
SI Grammar and Spelling Lab
An SI Board Since November 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
4711 68 0
Emcee:  jbe Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3786Well.... it is still the "being lost" that is "the most distressityc:>-2/17/2002
3785Yes, clearly Marmaduke's heart is warmed by the image of Rosamund, not by thE-2/17/2002
3784Let me take a stab at it . Yes, they do mean two different things. In the fityc:>-2/17/2002
3783Hmmm. I think they mean two different things and according to what you're trE-2/17/2002
3782>>the idea of it all being lost is distressing. or "the idea of its tyc:>-2/17/2002
3781There was a rumor rampant a few months ago that SI would suddenly fold (IHub wouE-2/17/2002
3780Hello: <i>It's a shame it died. </i> Yes, it was a lot of fun.Jack Clarke-2/17/2002
3779The adverb is dying. On TV ads, it's almost always, "Do it fast,"exdaytrader76-2/12/2002
3778Yamkita, hi! I remember you from a long time ago. This thread used to be so muchE-2/11/2002
3777Nice!Yamakita-2/11/2002
3776Your poem bilingual was <i>fine!</i> (in its reference to average FrE-2/11/2002
3775If a threadster spells 'fraught' with an 'o' When constructing aE-2/11/2002
3774I hope you are truly aware, How your writing is done with such flair, Tha youRambi-2/11/2002
3773But... but... it <i>isn't</i> on the same subject, is it? I meE-2/10/2002
3772Awesome E, That is remarkable timing on your part. I just penned this on the vRaymond Duray-2/4/2002
3771The question is why would we care If flamers make cyber warfare. The question, IE-2/4/2002
3770I'm not smart enough to respond to that. -g- TomThomas M.-2/2/2002
3769I can see why it is so rare. Laying the insipidity so bare. A question if I maRaymond Duray-2/2/2002
3768The rarely-seen all-limerick flamewar: groups.google.comThomas M.-2/1/2002
3767'I' used as object of the preposition 'for.' siliconinvestor.coE-1/30/2002
3766FWIW, I agree wholeheartedly with flapjack. It always comes down to ideas expresYamakita-8/16/2001
3765Well, let's just agree that we have different approaches. With your approacThe Philosopher-8/16/2001
3764Good writers don't need to jar the reader awake. They have the reader hookedMr. Whist-8/15/2001
3763I think what we have is a stylistic difference of opinion . Which probably isn&#The Philosopher-8/15/2001
3762You're correct. Beginning the sentence with "It was" is weaker thaMr. Whist-8/15/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):