FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL)

An SI Board Since August 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
41046	34	0	FTEL

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
38096	From that same article: >>In any case, most junk-equity deals probably d	Pat Garaffa	-	9/28/1998
38095	I guess you have a hard time reading, here it is again. "One other curios	L. Michael	-	9/28/1998
38094	Why won't you defend what you said? Do you still stand by what you said in	L. Michael	-	9/28/1998
38093	Jack & Pat G. One quick comment, you wrote to me earlier and Pat has menti	Noneyet	-	9/28/1998
38092	Thomas ~ I believe Frank's statement said that he had not sold any shares S	Jack Sman	-	9/28/1998
38091	Alright, Thomas ~ Here it is. This board and it's cheerleaders and detracto	Jack Sman	-	9/28/1998
38090	I don't know if this is good or bad for FTEL. But DGIV has just traded lo	DavidCG	-	9/28/1998
38089	Pat if this is your belief, you think Ftel Managment got suckered -- YOU KEEP	JHP	-	9/28/1998
38088	Lewis, Your answer in a nutshell: Negatives: Small company traded on the OTC	Pat Garaffa	-	9/28/1998
38087	You wrote and I quote, >>>>Thomas, re-read your original statement	Noneyet	-	9/28/1998
38086	What "slanderous statement"do you think Mr. DeSousa told about Ftel?	JHP	-	9/28/1998
38085	I don't know folks. If this company has anything at all going for it, why	lewis wireman	-	9/28/1998
38084	Jack, You have asked for documentation, this is taken directly from two docume	Noneyet	-	9/28/1998
38083	Jack very good post. It is sad that it has to come to this even at this stage o	Seth L.	-	9/28/1998
38082	Very nice post Jack! No bashing - just the facts. They should all read that w	Pat Garaffa	-	9/28/1998
38081	Jack, Without going into detail and answering or addressing your answers to my	Noneyet	-	9/28/1998
38080	Thomas ~ You wrote: <i>By the way, check the previous SEC filings for f	Jack Sman	-	9/28/1998
38079	Thomas, re-read your original statement. Do you still defend it? Is the statem	L. Michael	-	9/28/1998
38078	JHP the slander is the way you lied and misrepresented the lawsuit. You and Th	L. Michael	-	9/28/1998
38077	JHP, please comment on Desousa's slanderous statement that you just posted	L. Michael	-	9/28/1998
38076	L Micheal, To set the record straight, I am not JHP or Valuespec. That is easi	Noneyet	-	9/28/1998
38075	L. MICHAEL-- the AT&T lawsuit is still UNRESOLVED. AT&T at this date 9/	JHP	-	9/28/1998
38074	Hey guys haven't we already played this game a couple of times now? The	Wes Self	-	9/28/1998
38073	Vic get me banned from SI for asking questions? shame on you ! you do not answe	JHP	-	9/28/1998
38072	Helen, Please read this post, you will find interesting quotes. "One oth	L. Michael	-	9/28/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):