SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
HWP -- Hewlett Packard
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4722 63 0 HPQ
Emcee:  Lynn Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3840As the foundation keeps attacking the deal for reasons that only spoiled rich kiJerome-12/14/2001
3839Does Carly get her parachute if she resigns? I doubt it. My guess is they haveCharles Tutt-12/14/2001
3838I don't think he can easily speak for the entire board on this. After all, BelowTheCrowd-12/14/2001
3837So moved. :))The Duke of URL©-12/13/2001
3836I second that! <G>Night Writer-12/13/2001
3835Well, I for one, and I know I speak for the entire thread here, will be the firsThe Duke of URL©-12/13/2001
3834<b>Hackborn has said Hewlett-Packard's board and management will resigReseller-12/13/2001
3833quote.bloomberg.comReseller-12/13/2001
3832UPDATE 1-Walter Hewlett sees Compaq deal being defeated December 13, 2001 6:26:0ms.smartest.person-12/13/2001
3831UPDATE 1-Compaq board sees HP deal winning shareholder approval December 13, 200ms.smartest.person-12/13/2001
3830Not at all, I saw it in one of the news feeds that I reviewed earlier today. I&#Jerome-12/13/2001
3829So, you admit now that he didn't say that?Oeconomicus-12/13/2001
3828OK, Bushman why would they stick around? 1) They don't need the money 2) ThJerome-12/13/2001
3827<i>If you like HWP at 22 you will love it at 15, which is where many stockkumar-12/13/2001
3826OK, smart-guy. Give me a link to where Hackborn says he and many other directorsOeconomicus-12/13/2001
3825Bushman..read more shoot your mouth off less (eom)Jerome-12/13/2001
3824<i>...says that if the merger is voted down, he and other board members thOeconomicus-12/13/2001
3823Lets see if we have this right... Hackborn the most influencial HWP board membeJerome-12/13/2001
3822That was inevitable. BillWilliam Partmann-12/13/2001
3821<B>Dick Hackborn Resigns from Hewlett Foundation</b> suite101.com Kirk ©-12/13/2001
3820u do all the CPQ positive hooplas u want to do. my vote as a HWP stockholder doekumar-12/12/2001
3819Jerome, thanks for the link to quicken.com's comparison page. It looks to bUncle Frank-12/12/2001
3818Unclcle Frank...thanks for the postings... Here is another one that does a direJerome-12/12/2001
3817Wednesday December 12 7:40 PM ET Packard Trust Stands Firm Against Merger By PeUncle Frank-12/12/2001
3816>> CPQ is having a good quarter but I'm not sure about HWP. Perhaps yUncle Frank-12/12/2001
3815Well, there is that. <g> So maybe their BEST strategy is just to walk awCharles Tutt-12/12/2001
3814<i>I think HWP's best strategy right now would be to announce they'kumar-12/12/2001
3813>>>CPQ... I've felt for some time that was a dog stock...<<&lJerome-12/12/2001
3812I think HWP's best strategy right now would be to announce they're not gCharles Tutt-12/12/2001
3811<i>wonder if there are any long term HP shareholders who support the mergekumar-12/12/2001
3810<i>Its been difficult to determine how much of the stock drop was due to SOeconomicus-12/12/2001
3809<I>The fact is, under the current arrangement, HP would be awarding cpq a Kirk ©-12/12/2001
3808RD...both stocks did drop with the announcement...but that's just typical knJerome-12/12/2001
3807>> HWP completes the deal and the after the dilution HWP goes from todaysUncle Frank-12/12/2001
3806The problem with your theory is that it relies on the assumption that this is a Oeconomicus-12/12/2001
3805OK Uncle...try this.... HWP completes the deal and the after the dilution HWP gJerome-12/12/2001
3804I agree with you. Dilution is every bit as costly to shareholders as a cash traUncle Frank-12/12/2001
3803Please reread my post. I am not saying that, I am quoting someone else saying tThe Duke of URL©-12/12/2001
3802R. D., <i>Wasted cash or wasted dilution - both suck. </I> ThanksDave B-12/12/2001
3801OK then, the billion shares they were planning on using to buy CPQ. Wasted cash Oeconomicus-12/12/2001
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News