SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Save The World Air Inc. (ZERO)
An SI Board Since March 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
445 17 0 ZERO
Emcee:  SCOOBEY-DO Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
395re. <<Is there any reason to cover before the price matches the name?>&Q.-1/20/2001
394Congratz! 95% is certainly good enough; those last few points can sometimes takMighty_Mezz-1/20/2001
393Is there any reason to cover before the price matches the name? I'm still sMr. Aloha-1/20/2001
392Well, I'm finally out of this one. My limit order to cover at 1/4 finally exQ.-1/19/2001
391You'd think the recording would have included the US number of the SI firm. Mighty_Mezz-12/14/2000
390You are right, the recording says that for any inquiries, one should call AustraQ.-12/14/2000
389US offices of ZERO closed down. Call 800-897-9556 and listen to the recording. Mighty_Mezz-12/14/2000
388I think the scrutiny of the SEC might have something to do with it. Did you heMighty_Mezz-12/12/2000
387looks like Muller's other Save the World company (Save The World Technology)Q.-12/12/2000
386I'm still waiting to hear something from Jamaica. That was supposed to be thMighty_Mezz-12/5/2000
385Who will be the lucky CEO? The latest 10Q shows zero cash, zero revenues, and aQ.-12/5/2000
384So who is the lucky MM?-->"Save The World Air will submit a completed upStockDung-11/30/2000
383Where one selects to reside on the risk/reward ratio curve is a personal matter.peter michaelson-11/1/2000
382It depends on your risk aversion, but 2% of a portfolio in one short is too muchQ.-11/1/2000
381I'll let N-Squiggle (LOL) respond to that one. As I said, I think the 0.5% peter michaelson-11/1/2000
380But if a position is so dangerous that one can't afford to short more than 0Daniel Chisholm-11/1/2000
379Thanks. I think you have summed it up very well. A very professional outlook. peter michaelson-10/31/2000
378OT, re. <i>what your trading strategy was to deal with the unlimited potenQ.-10/31/2000
377John: Congrats. I am still holding some shares short also. Doesn't look lpeter michaelson-10/30/2000
376Etrade bought my shares in at 1.50ish. I should have just reshorted it.. chbartCraig Bartels-10/30/2000
375Peter, it looks like my prediction in July that ZERO would trade below a buck inQ.-10/30/2000
374ceocast.com T R U T H "KNOW THE TRUTH AND THE TStockDung-10/24/2000
373Maybe it will be good enough for New York. After all, a mechanic there reported Q.-9/24/2000
372He really shouldn't have chosen California as an example. CA is very strict.Mighty_Mezz-9/24/2000
371Oh Yeah. He says he's really impressed with the company. (What company? I thQ.-9/24/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News