SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
GateField (GATE)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4005 15 0 GATE
Emcee:  Chi Jones Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
3980 The Definitive (Final) Proxy Statement is available at freeedgar.com and seasytarget-6/10/2000
3979 Yes, I saw that on Raging Bull. Lots more information over there. Do you havToolManInc-6/8/2000
3978 Check out the latest messages from Raging Bull board. They say Gate is worth a R Petersen-6/8/2000
3977 SyncMan, thanks for the reply. I sent the article to the IR at Gatefield. AsToolManInc-6/6/2000
3976 ToolManInc, I can see how you are confused. If I'm not mistaken, then theSyncMan-6/6/2000
3975 Actel bought Gatefield on May 11.....why the vote? This is just another examplToolManInc-6/5/2000
3974 RP, I'm still holding my meager shares and I can't get rich or go to thTom Shutters-6/2/2000
3973 Another consideration might be how far behind the ProASIC product is MRAM, whicWilliam E. Harriot-6/2/2000
3972 If Actel chooses to walk away from Gate, then this company would be in chapter sks1-6/1/2000
3971 R Petersen, Did you go to the stockholder's meeting today? If so, what ifToolManInc-5/31/2000
3970 Tom, are you still here? What are your plans for the stock, I am not sure what R Petersen-5/31/2000
3969 Anybody going to the stockholders meeting tomorrow?ToolManInc-5/30/2000
3968 Certainly a lot more discussion. About content, it all boils down to this: DoSyncMan-5/16/2000
3967 Much better discussion on this board: ragingbull.comToolManInc-5/15/2000
3966 I will vote No and will also support and help with a lawsuit against the deal. ToolManInc-5/14/2000
3965 <i>Percents don't bother me, I am going to vote my conscience.</i&lml-5/14/2000
3964 <i>Actually, since this company is registered in Delaware, there is a goolml-5/14/2000
3963 Percents don't bother me, I am going to vote my conscience. I will vote NOToolManInc-5/14/2000
3962 SyncMan You state: "If 50.1% of the shareholders of GATE stock vote for easytarget-5/14/2000
3961 Yes, EZ, Saxe's comments are truly an insult & a joke in the eyes of GAlml-5/12/2000
3960 Hey, easy. Looking at the chart (I haven't looked at my Gatefield stock inSyncMan-5/12/2000
3959 Current "Market Value"!!! For the past 2 weeks, GATEFIELD has been seasytarget-5/12/2000
3958 This is also very interesting: ragingbull.comToolManInc-5/12/2000
3957 Some very interesting points in this message.... ragingbull.comToolManInc-5/11/2000
3956 You're saying if the current price of the stock was .40, then Actel would hSyncMan-5/11/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News