SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Lam Research (LRCX, NASDAQ): To the Insiders
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5867 96 0 LRCX
Emcee:  Stock Watcher Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4017 Nice report What was the date for it? Good move up today. Perhaps others read Kirk ©-3/7/2000
4016 It never ceases to amaze me how much operational leverage LRCX has to further iJong Hyun Yoo-3/7/2000
4015 From Briefing.com - Monday After Hours : Doesn't always pay to be the quickms.smartest.person-3/6/2000
4014 Headline: Lam Research Corporation Announces Stockholder Approval of Three-For-cluka-3/6/2000
4013 OT to Jarrett re Biotechs, I don't know HQH. Your description makes it soIan@SI-3/5/2000
4012 Hello Ian, Thanks to your insights, I made early and very profitable investmenCoolwire-3/5/2000
4011 Lam Research Reiterated `Strong Buy' at Morgan Stanley DW By Michael O. DonProud_Infidel-3/3/2000
4010 ***OT*** Thanks Ian! I like the way you think! I picked BRKS over PRIA becausw0z-3/3/2000
4009 OT to Bill Tippett, I still hold PRIA, MTSN, SVGI, UTEK and CDN. I expect PRIIan@SI-3/3/2000
4008 <i>I now hold only 5 Chip Equipment companies and only 2 chip companies. w0z-3/3/2000
4007 Thanks once again JHY for all you do here on the LRCX board! BTW, my first famKirk ©-3/3/2000
4006 Here are some comments by CSFB. LRCX will make so much that they will be taxedJong Hyun Yoo-3/1/2000
4005 I guess you guys are feeling some uneasiness about continuous stock price appreJong Hyun Yoo-3/1/2000
4004 Duker looking to grab 4004 ... any way you read it, it is 4004. --DukerDuker-3/1/2000
4003 Cary, I can understand that. I now hold only 5 Chip Equipment companies and oIan@SI-3/1/2000
4002 Infineon mum on ProMOS expansion, plans 300-mm fab of its own By Jack RobertsoProud_Infidel-3/1/2000
4001 Ian, It was and wasn't tongue in cheek. The veterans here don't need Cary Salsberg-3/1/2000
4000 Duker, Amen. Ian who shamelessly attempted to grub post number 4000.Ian@SI-3/1/2000
3999 <i>And right now the market sees the former going on for as long as the mDuker-3/1/2000
3998 Duker, I suspect that Cary's comment to you was at least partially tongue Ian@SI-3/1/2000
3997 Duker, I must admit that some of your recent posts dampened my optimism a bit Proud_Infidel-3/1/2000
3996 Cary, Don't mean to dampen the soiree. I looked back and have only postedDuker-3/1/2000
3995 Duker, I completely agree, BUT, since you have sold you have been making ratioCary Salsberg-3/1/2000
3994 <i>I'm not sure which is worse: fear of failure by selling too soon oDuker-3/1/2000
3993 >>At least pretend to show some fear.<< I'm not sure which isJerome-2/29/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News