SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5582 39 0 MTXX
Emcee:  StockDung Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4082I know. What a waste! A couple hundred cold sufferers would have gladly stipulMike M-12/19/2001
4081"Preliminary results in the study, which involved 2,096 patients.." GHank-12/19/2001
4080"Dr Frederick Hayden of the University of Virginia told an infectious diseaMichaelSkyy-12/19/2001
4079All things are possible Mark. The cold market has the potential to support moreMike M-12/19/2001
4078Innuendo? I thought I was pretty clear. Maybe a little snide, but that's tMark Marcellus-12/19/2001
4077Don't be naive mad. The factual statistics were not criticized. If you canMike M-12/19/2001
4076Mike you are sooooo open minded. Even when someone posts factual statistics thatMad2-12/19/2001
4075Patent upheld... siliconinvestor.comMichaelSkyy-12/18/2001
4074How clever, Mark. All that and a stock snob too. I'm so impressed.Mike M-12/17/2001
4073<i>If you think everyone is going to prefer a doctor's prescription anMark Marcellus-12/17/2001
4072You're welcome to pop pills. There are plenty of people such as yourself whMike M-12/17/2001
4071Ooops. newsday.com Hope that "nicotine gel" is ready real soon. On Mark Marcellus-12/17/2001
4070<<<i>Anyone know how old Bill is? </i>>> You mean in &Mike M-12/17/2001
4069Mike M The blind squirrel has found a nut, that is why he is here. Everyone iSteve Felix-12/17/2001
4068And yet here is VPHM with the FDA: Message 16799211Sir Auric Goldfinger-12/17/2001
4067Bill, <<<Of course, if it really worked it would be flying off the shepz-12/17/2001
4066You claimed that you can "prove" that "GumTech fraudulently promo24601-12/17/2001
4065What is your proof that it is worthless and fraudulent?24601-12/17/2001
4064Two and a half years ago you assured your brown nosed brigade that the stock wouMike M-12/17/2001
4063Interesting that GUMM has yet to provide any proof of the efficacy of Zicam. OfBill Wexler-12/17/2001
4062Don't get too comfortable calling that "proof."24601-12/17/2001
4061<<<Are you saying that some regulatory body like the FDA ought to be doBill Wexler-12/17/2001
40601000 shares? LOL, that's pathetic...maybe he's covering his short positiTatnic-12/16/2001
4059Wexler: I just saw a Zicam commercial on television. It made some pretty explici24601-12/16/2001
4058"Do you blame your folks for your need to compensate?" Perhaps you ouHank-12/15/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):