SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)
An SI Board Since May 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
4345 118 0 HPQ
Emcee:  Lynn Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4095I think you are only half right. Carly did the merger but from what I heard, emKirk ©-8/30/2007
4094<i>To the extent that Hurd's performance is the reason that the companElroy-8/30/2007
4093 To the extent that Hurd's performance is the reason that the company has dTimF-8/30/2007
4092Hurd Exercise and sale It looks like he is cashing out 100,000 options a quartKirk ©-8/30/2007
40911. You and NW got defensive and pissy long before I made an allegedly "nastOeconomicus-8/30/2007
4090 It may not have been friendly but it wasn't nasty. And if your looking foTimF-8/30/2007
4089Read the last paragraph of his posting 4081. I thought it was rather nasty, uncaLynn-8/30/2007
4088Oh, I see. Jokingly asking if "exciting" is the same thing as "voOeconomicus-8/30/2007
4087 I don't see any crude behavior on his part. No personal insults, and evenTimF-8/29/2007
4086You really need somebody to explain this to you? Ridiculing another person’s inNight Writer-8/29/2007
4085True, but the writing was on the wall. I'm pleased that the merger did makeKirk ©-8/29/2007
4084Well, in all fairness, CPQ had a much better chance on its own than did Gateway.Oeconomicus-8/29/2007
4083Acer shares tumble following Gateway bid smh.com.au Note the similarities with Kirk ©-8/29/2007
4082They still haven't gotten over their company wasn't going to make it on Kirk ©-8/29/2007
4081Perhaps, then, you can explain which of these two posts was <i>inhospitablOeconomicus-8/29/2007
4080I agree with everything you say, NW. Let me add that posters on the CPQ thread gLynn-8/29/2007
4079Then why do you keep posting to me?Oeconomicus-8/29/2007
4078I just think you are boring. :>)Night Writer-8/28/2007
4077No, he implied he took offense to something in my post. Maybe he didn't likeOeconomicus-8/28/2007
4076 I'm not sure he was being sensitive. Maybe he was saying "boring andTimF-8/28/2007
4075<i>You [sic] reply was another reason not to post.</i> A tad over-sOeconomicus-8/28/2007
4074You reply was another reason not to post.Night Writer-8/28/2007
4073<i>The CPQ board was mostly long term holders rather then traders.</i&gOeconomicus-8/27/2007
4072The CPQ board was mostly long term holders rather then traders. CPQ was an excitNight Writer-8/27/2007
4071I suspect a lot of stock threads are dead relative to the posting volumes of 6-1Oeconomicus-8/23/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News