SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
NIFTY NINE IN NINETY NINE PLUS ONE
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
613 3 0
Emcee:  Arthur Radley Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
413 Rick, your EXPERT opinion is needed. I have a position in ATRX, and their majorArthur Radley-2/13/1999
412 Concerning ATRX and the Yahoo! data, the Barron's data is more current and Arthur Radley-2/13/1999
411 TV: CNNfn; Your Money, 2/12 11:30 PM <summary> Biotech is back, after a Arthur Radley-2/13/1999
410 Scott, The data on Yahoo! is not correct. The analyst that skewed these resultsArthur Radley-2/13/1999
409 Dude, the insider purchases are pretty bullish. biz.yahoo.com But why the majScott H. Davis-2/12/1999
408 Rick: I'm no expert, but I did some lab work for an M.E. who was also a paMerritt-2/12/1999
407 Thanks, good stuff! Sounds like everyone is sort of skirting the issue. Expscaram(o)uche-2/12/1999
406 <I took a "flyer" on FUSE this morning at 9 7/8 as it appears to LLCF-2/12/1999
405 I took a "flyer" on FUSE this morning at 9 7/8 as it appears to want Arthur Radley-2/12/1999
404 Bill you are asking the "tuff" questions this morning.(:>) But we Arthur Radley-2/12/1999
403 TD, two more questions for you? Why would dentists want to use such a fast traWWS-2/12/1999
402 Good question Bill as this was the initial question I had about this company. HArthur Radley-2/12/1999
401 TD, thanks for the lead to the story. Just looked at the chart for ATRX. CoulWWS-2/12/1999
400 My drum roll is getting louder for ATRX. Just think! A disease that nearly 75% Arthur Radley-2/12/1999
399 Bill: You're asking the wrong guy. I am chemistry-challenged. Rickscaram(o)uche-2/12/1999
398 RH: abcnews.go.comMerritt-2/12/1999
397 Richard, here's an interesting abstract that mentions how newly developed mWWS-2/12/1999
396 TD: Gonna do some medline searching and get back to you. I didn't know thscaram(o)uche-2/12/1999
395 Rick, What is your take on cyclosporine making pre-existing cancers grow more rArthur Radley-2/11/1999
394 (FYI) Axys Pharmaceuticals Advances Clinical Development of APC 2059 in Both PsScott H. Davis-2/11/1999
393 ENMD putting up "brave front" in WSJ today. However, if they think thArthur Radley-2/11/1999
392 >>ENMD . . . just think that only a few months ago it reached 85.00.<RCMac-2/10/1999
391 Bill, I don't think so, however, this will add to the problems of future fuArthur Radley-2/10/1999
390 TD, will today's market's rejection of ENMD rub off on other speculativWWS-2/10/1999
389 We might see a little action in GLGC today. A very positive article in todayArthur Radley-2/10/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):