SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve
An SI Board Since October 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
6710 8 0
Emcee:  Cisco Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4201Hi CB, Thanks for the info on the Seminole situation. I was unaware of the invRaymond Duray-12/1/2000
4200Hahahahaha......Good one, CB, but the bench would be much too restrictive a limoosebeary-12/1/2000
4199Just what are you trying to do, Chomolunga? Disenfranchise all democrat votermoosebeary-12/1/2000
4198Well, it's MS. Justice Ginsburg, and she is qualified, make no mistake, to wIlaine-12/1/2000
4197TraderGreg A couple of days ago I mentioned that the Palm Beach ballot had instchomolungma-12/1/2000
4196Mr. Justice Ginsburg, is, in a word, unqualified.moosebeary-12/1/2000
4195I found Justice Ginsburg's questioning to be disengenuous. I have never truIlaine-12/1/2000
4194Yes, and that is why the country needs Dubya to win....other wise the US SC maymoosebeary-12/1/2000
4193A similar case to the Seminole case just got put on Judge Lewis' docket. YoIlaine-12/1/2000
4192Cobalt, Did you find it ironic that a liberal SC Justice, I'm speaking of Gchomolungma-12/1/2000
4191Moose, I don't have a problem with your interpretation of the law. I agree Ilaine-12/1/2000
4190I repeat: There is no provision in the constitution for a state to "not moosebeary-12/1/2000
4189U.S. Supreme Court Opportunity The real opportunity for the U.S. Supreme Court Bill Fischofer-12/1/2000
4188<b>Votes cannot be dismissed on a technicality</B>, according to theBill-12/1/2000
4187Hi CB, <i>But you don't really get it, Ray. You are blaming Bush'Raymond Duray-12/1/2000
4186The FL SC's decision on the butterfly ballots goes to great lengths stressinBill-12/1/2000
4185Gore just lost butterfly ballot case. Bye bye.Bill-12/1/2000
4184>>why would the Florida Legislature need to do anything at all?<< Ilaine-12/1/2000
4183"Boy, Are They Gonna Get Some Calls!" dept. A CNN talking head was juCYBERKEN-12/1/2000
4182I don't suppose it has occurred to the establishment media to check and see CYBERKEN-12/1/2000
4181More Republican voting fraud. This time the R's actually removed the ballotWindsock-12/1/2000
4180Greg, The Wall Street Journal says that even though federal law requires the vochomolungma-12/1/2000
4179Obviously the FL SC did not agree with the Bush briefs or the SOS briefs, which Bill-12/1/2000
4178But if what TG is saying is true and that the electors that have already been pichomolungma-12/1/2000
4177I think I decided that the game was over on Tuesday, but that's because I knIlaine-12/1/2000
4176Actually this whole thing has been giving me a bad headache because of some of tTraderGreg-12/1/2000
4175Actually, Jeb doesn't have to re-certify them...if the Congress were to get TraderGreg-12/1/2000
4174<i>Moosebeary says we're all stupid if we don't know what appointechomolungma-12/1/2000
4173From an intellectual standpoint, this election is very stimulating, but otherwisIlaine-12/1/2000
4172Moosebeary says we're all stupid if we don't know what appointed electorTraderGreg-12/1/2000
4171I didn't see the Florida Legislature on Tuesday, but what you describe is cechomolungma-12/1/2000
4170I think the consensus on the thread is that 270 Electoral votes are needed one wIlaine-12/1/2000
4169Did we ever resolve what the outcome would be if Florida DIDN'T send electorchomolungma-12/1/2000
4168The chips will fall that way because they must. The Florida Legislature has beeIlaine-12/1/2000
4167<i>They will pick Bush regardless, but Gore will destroy Bush politically chomolungma-12/1/2000
4166I am listening - I have no idea how the Court will rule. You are right about thIlaine-12/1/2000
4165<I>, I got the feeling that you are a moderate </i> I think you hitOral Roberts-12/1/2000
4164Bill, the author makes his point by letting the Republican court briefs speak fojbe112/1/2000
4163It seems to me that Gore is walking a fine line here. If the Supreme Court rulechomolungma-12/1/2000
4162CNN sent three reporters in, and one has come out - Roger somebody, he comments Ilaine-12/1/2000
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News