SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INPR - Inprise to Borland (BORL)
An SI Board Since April 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5102 19 0 INPR
Emcee:  Kashish King Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4202 <i>By the way, that was one hell of a recommendation to your relatives toi-node-1/29/2000
4201 Mr. T, I can't find those posts either, but I do remember them clearly. MCube-1/29/2000
4200 Not sure if this has already been posted here...a correction to an article in wPistolPete-1/29/2000
4199 LPG: You're welcome. INPR has made at least one investment: Message 125959Big Dog-1/29/2000
4198 Cube Yes we have all learned to have a more stable outlook -especially after aTTOSBT-1/29/2000
4197 Mr. T, Been away for a while but still follow INPR closely. Regardless of whaCube-1/29/2000
4196 <<He can do this by issuing press releases throughout this coming quarterLTK007-1/29/2000
4195 Darrell I just heard the conference call and I am now more confident that INPR LPG-1/29/2000
4194 Maher: If you listen to the conference call, you'll hear CEO Fuller talk abBig Dog-1/29/2000
4193 Synopsis of INPR's 4th Q conference call [The INPR conference call is availBig Dog-1/29/2000
4192 Maher: You stated, "The announcement regarding the deal with Cisco left uBig Dog-1/29/2000
4191 Thanks for the response. Here are a few excerpts from the article you referred Maher Sid-Ahmed-1/29/2000
4190 Agreed Naz -8.2% and INPR -17% so it was still effected by that earnings reportTTOSBT-1/29/2000
4189 Good ideas! One last comment before I go to sleep. The Nasdaq had its worst weeBig Dog-1/29/2000
4188 Re: <i>Dale address this marketing issue during his interview with Doc SeTTOSBT-1/29/2000
4187 By the way, here's an explanation of why BEA Systems went from $13 to $80 iBig Dog-1/29/2000
4186 Thanks TTOBST. By the way, you were correct about Wall Street's coverage ofBig Dog-1/29/2000
4185 Maher: Please read Dennis Nicks' discussion of Old Borland vs. "new&quBig Dog-1/29/2000
4184 Re: <i>"So, please forgive me for using your posts as a jump off poiTTOSBT-1/29/2000
4183 Can anyone explain why revenue growth for the last two years have been negativeMaher Sid-Ahmed-1/28/2000
4182 Did EVERYONE forget about a Y2K lockdown? Several companies got smoked this quBradley W. Price-1/28/2000
4181 Dennis, thanks for posting those numbers. I didn't catch them during the CCBradley W. Price-1/28/2000
4180 Well, since Tom won't, I will excuse you now. Very good. I will mark you Bradley W. Price-1/28/2000
4179 The Comdex show last October really got Linux on the map , I hope this show aloLPG-1/28/2000
4178 Hey, LPG: Yes. I think with 1999 behind us and Linux being a significant part oBig Dog-1/28/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):