SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Kulicke and Soffa
An SI Board Since November 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5482 91 0 KLIC
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4357<<I remember back in 1998 it fell to .67 of trailing yearly sales. And thaZ Analyzer-10/4/2000
4356There was some discussion back a little about how to determine where the bottom BWAC-10/4/2000
4355I'd like to bring up another point. When is KLIC going to do something with BWAC-10/3/2000
4354BWAC, I don't have a clue, but here's an interesting option site. I suppGottfried-10/3/2000
4353Thats is a very good post you referenced. It makes sense. But sense is bad theseBWAC-10/3/2000
4352Hi Z Analyzer, Glad you were pointed to others, as I am mostly a technical analyYogizuna-10/3/2000
4351BWAC and William, Tito on the AMAT thread just posted some info on leaps. He'Gottfried-10/3/2000
4350Unless you want the capital loss to offset some capital gains, I'm not sure Ian@SI-10/3/2000
4349William, I agree with the other 2 previous posts. I'd keep my position spreBWAC-10/3/2000
4348William, I second Gottfried. In this market there seems to be no sense to maProud_Infidel-10/3/2000
4347William, we all have failed to foresee this disaster because it follows no rhymeGottfried-10/3/2000
4346I trying to figure out a strategy to minimize losses(or maximize gains<g> William Griffin-10/3/2000
4345Scott, ><i>Hubris. We're all full of it.</i>< Some are fulGottfried-10/3/2000
4344Hubris.... There is a reason I named the SEM portfolio 'Hubris - SEM'. scott_jiminez-10/3/2000
4343Scott, ><i>Would 'golly!' be appropriate?</i>< Your reGottfried-10/3/2000
4342Am I imagining this or does it appear that virtually EVERY SEM is required to gescott_jiminez-10/3/2000
4341<i>Scott Jiminez will be able to answer your question better.</i> Ascott_jiminez-10/1/2000
4340Brian, another rough week and then the market will soar, based on my own privateGottfried-10/1/2000
4339<i>Welcome to the club of sufferers. :)</i> And what a motley crew Proud_Infidel-10/1/2000
4338Z, Scott Jiminez will be able to answer your question better. I think K&S wiGottfried-10/1/2000
4337Yogi, Gottfried Good to see familiar names over here. Seems like a real high Z Analyzer-10/1/2000
4336<i>Hey, don't knock TER.</i> Yeah I rode TER for a ~3 bagger frscott_jiminez-9/30/2000
4335<i>There's also its brethren, Teradecline. </i> Hey, don't kAlan Siegal-9/29/2000
4334<i>I thought it's Click and Suffer</i> There's also its brscott_jiminez-9/29/2000
4333<i>why do I always have the urge ....to call these guys. Kulick and SAlan Siegal-9/29/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News