SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
GUMM - Eliminate the Common Cold
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
5582 39 0 MTXX
Emcee:  StockDung Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4407<b>DAN, DONT FORGET TO MENTION THE TAX LOSS BENIFIT IN THOSE EARNINGS FIGUStockDung-5/14/2003
4406Dan, Yeah you were too optimistic then and you seem to be too optimistic now. pz-5/14/2003
4405Paul, There's no doubt that in 1999 and 2000, I was too optimistic about hoDanZ-5/14/2003
4404The sales and profit analysis in that post was right on target. The only thing DanZ-5/14/2003
4403Vintage Dan zero2000 Reply to proveittome Part 1 by: makemilns (38/M) 11/26/00 StockDung-5/13/2003
4402<b>Research from a long, $33 - $38 / share Re: Reply to proveittome Part 4StockDung-5/13/2003
4401Maybe Danny Boy can provide us one of his dissertations, er I mean market analysMad2-5/13/2003
4400<b>THE REALITY BEHIND THE 'MATRIX' SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) -- ThisStockDung-5/13/2003
4399Dan, "You are holding a short position in this company out of spite, <bpz-5/13/2003
4398<b>DAN, YOUR REPORT WAS FOR THE LONG TERM AND $32 IS NOT $18. WAS THE $18 StockDung-5/13/2003
4397You're wrong, Floyd. I haven't always been wrong about this stock. LikDanZ-5/13/2003
4396<b>BTW DAN, I KNEW THE PRESS RELEASE WAS COMING SINCE THIS IS A TYPICAL TYStockDung-5/12/2003
4395<b>SURE THEY ENDORSE IT. THEY PUT OUT A PRESS RELEASE ENDORSING THE REPORTStockDung-5/12/2003
4394<b>SCAMCENTRAL->Press Release Source: Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. MatriStockDung-5/12/2003
4393Hello, Mad! Someone told me that GUMM/MRXX is possibly working on something usefRockyBalboa-5/12/2003
4392<b>DAN, YOU HAVE BEEN WRONG ABOUT GUMM/MTXX FOR YEARS. LOOK AT YOUR OLD REStockDung-5/12/2003
4391lol I laughed at mad's post too. Logical analysis such as posting nearly teDanZ-5/11/2003
4390Factual and logical analysis such as this, huh? Please don't make me laugh,Mike M-5/11/2003
4389<b>BOTH Christopher Ferruzza, James Sparacino HAD WORKED FOR HARRISON SECUStockDung-5/10/2003
4388Mike your support of this POS and critism of those that actually provide usefullMad2-5/10/2003
4387<b>DAN, ONLY INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS I SEE ARE THE DUMPING MTXX ONES. ClStockDung-5/10/2003
4386Re:<<<i>David Lavigne is no analyst but a worthless terminated stockMike M-5/10/2003
4385Truthseeker, Please give me some reasons why I (or anyone), should take up a shpz-5/10/2003
4384Ben, Zimmerman was that kid from NJ who hyped worthless stocks. He is a big kid StockDung-5/9/2003
4383You young man, me think you need one of my girls who serve dim sum to straightenBen Wa-5/9/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News