SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Complacency Indexes
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1487 37 0
Emcee:  TechTrader42 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
462Here are the CI's after the close: ST Naz CI: 62.277, 93.096 MT Naz CI: 62.TechTrader42-2/4/2002
461>Cisco Systems (NasdaqNM: CSCO) lost 3 percent. The behemoth will unveil its William JH-2/4/2002
460Bouncing around in a volatile market, I suppose. Plus, the recent tight range inTechTrader42-2/4/2002
459What's going on with the S&P? Bizarre readings twice today, unless the ePaul Shread-2/4/2002
458They put the gangstas in that pit, Monty. Here are the latest CI's: ST NaTechTrader42-2/4/2002
457LOL, Brooke can tell you some horror stories also. She used to call it the PIT Monty Lenard-2/4/2002
456No reason why I didn't post on SAII, Paul. I just post on whichever thread ITechTrader42-2/4/2002
455That's a big drop in LT S&P; on one hand, that's a good sign for thePaul Shread-2/4/2002
454My trading is not at all scientific, I shorted MU around $40 five different timeWilliam JH-2/4/2002
453ST Naz CI: 80.692 93.096 MT Naz CI: 80.735 93.096 LT Naz CI: 96.493 98.743 ST STechTrader42-2/4/2002
452There's certainly strong resistance at 37. But it's Maria's stock. LTechTrader42-2/2/2002
451Brooke, that is a nice hanging man on MU. MontyMonty Lenard-2/2/2002
450At the close: ST Naz CI: 93.096 100.000 MT Naz CI: 93.096 100.000 LT Naz CI: 98TechTrader42-2/1/2002
449The CI's will be revised so that they're entirely based on the BartiromoTechTrader42-2/1/2002
448Brook, You may have your CIs, but I use this index, tiac.net, mine works betterJohn Carson-2/1/2002
447Such unkind remarks about the Money Honey! The Naz CI's all hit 100 again TechTrader42-2/1/2002
446Poor Maria only feels threatened. Marcie can rant faster, is younger, smarter, Roads End-2/1/2002
445She's always touting MU, it seems. Today, she was hyperventilating over MorgTechTrader42-2/1/2002
444Along with the AJC index, perhaps we could chart Maria "on the heels of&quoWilliam JH-2/1/2002
443The AJC indicator would suggest a reversal within three trading days after her aTechTrader42-1/31/2002
442Brooke, you need to incorporate the AJC index in here somewhere. She just makesMonty Lenard-1/31/2002
441Here are the CI's after the close. ST Naz CI: 100.000, 79.835 MT Naz CI: TechTrader42-1/31/2002
440ST Naz CI: 83.608 79.835 MT Naz CI: 83.608 79.835 LT Naz CI: 97.153 96.498 ST STechTrader42-1/31/2002
439ST Naz CI: 41.863 65.330 MT Naz CI: 41.863 65.330 LT Naz CI: 89.904 93.979 ST STechTrader42-1/30/2002
438Yes, what you said about the head fake lower was very interesting. That's juTechTrader42-1/29/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News