SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2
An SI Board Since April 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
5315 66 0
Emcee:  Neenny Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4965Doug - I probably should wait for the translation, but I'll take a stab. Yorrufff-9/23/2003
4964Dear rrufff, Let me echo your post to me to help me understand that the contentsd:oug-9/23/2003
4963Do these two statements fall under the TOU violation below? If so, why hasn'mike bone (Hijacked)-9/23/2003
4962relax Doug, your vector is beginning to point into outer-spaceAK2004-9/22/2003
4961<i>My interpretation of your posts and, it is my interpretation, is that yDone, gone.-9/22/2003
4960I really hate to be blunt sometimes as you seem to have some good intentions. Hrrufff-9/22/2003
4959Just another post thay shows what a liar you are. Several of us (those not so chbob-9/22/2003
4958Your point only has magnitude, mine also has direction (aka) a vector to protectd:oug-9/22/2003
4957Doug I do not have a problem with Bob. I had a problem with one specific decisioAK2004-9/22/2003
4956(or) Once again for the first time, read Si's TOU and i'am sure you willd:oug-9/22/2003
4955re: <i>That's bob for you. In a bad investment many of us were hangingAK2004-9/22/2003
4954re: <i>What I post has been very viable and verifiable</i> why sidnAK2004-9/22/2003
4953re: <i>If the rruff(s) and anti-Bux types would stop crying over these verAK2004-9/22/2003
4952"Doug... You [write] response without [responding] to any of [Albert'sd:oug-9/22/2003
4951well, SI Bob's job is not an easy one :-))AK2004-9/22/2003
4950You haven't changed bob but why would I post like this if I was an NAMX scamSidney Reilly-9/21/2003
4949I really like this one, Bob. It's the one where Zeev tells your bud Marty thbob-9/21/2003
4948You farking liar! Here is just one. Message 1895674 Edit...LMAO! Your reply tobob-9/21/2003
4947He may have been. I just don't remember. But I still have those threads bookSidney Reilly-9/21/2003
4946Zeev was there. Way more than once. Want to place a little wager on it?bob-9/21/2003
4945I don't remember zeev ever being on the NAMX thread. But I think my post is Sidney Reilly-9/21/2003
4944You wish that is how it went. You lie so much now I think you believe it your sebob-9/21/2003
4943bob and I were in the same investment years ago North American Exploration NAMX.Sidney Reilly-9/21/2003
4942I'd call on Bob to prove it. He seems to know more about you than I do.rrufff-9/21/2003
4941As I said....show me.Sidney Reilly-9/21/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News