SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
HITSGALORE.COM (HITT)
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
7056 46 0 HITT
Emcee:  bob sims Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
4981 I believe that Jeff was referring to an item in the civil docket that you posteTommy Hicks-1/22/2000
4980 Yes, it's hilarious and we knew about it. But since the case never went toJanice Shell-1/21/2000
4979 Janice, I am forwarding testimony of one of the Fools concerning a prank much lcarranza-1/21/2000
4978 Was Jeff referring to an unsuccessful appeal of Reed's criminal conviction?Q.-1/19/2000
4977 No, actually we can't: it's still a civil judgment.Janice Shell-1/19/2000
4976 lol. And have Dorian and Audrey been following the order set down by the judgJanice Shell-1/19/2000
4975 Since the FTC case is civil, I think there's just one felony conviction. Mighty_Mezz-1/19/2000
4974 <i>12/3/99 22 JUDGMENT OF USCA (certified copy) "AFFIRMING" theJeffrey S. Mitchell-1/19/2000
4973 U.S. District Court District of MarylandQ.-1/19/2000
4972 next post: docket for FTC suit against Dorian Reed. Here's my favorite parQ.-1/19/2000
4971 D bar - the Foley Group was configured as a toxic floorless denbenture arrangeTom Terf-1/18/2000
4970 Obwon alert!! He's making predictions again: <b>Ooops, didn't nJanice Shell-1/18/2000
4969 re. Wilcher's affiliate Robert Ponikvar, The Maricopa Superior Court docketQ.-1/17/2000
4968 Dee-bar, <i>would you give millions of dollars in cash to someone who seDaniel Chisholm-1/17/2000
4967 <i>You see, the people who do that kind of financing are interested in geJeffrey S. Mitchell-1/17/2000
4966 Perhaps they should sweeten the pot. 4% per week for 40 weeks per year? SecureTommy Hicks-1/17/2000
4965 I think it is unlikely that HITT would qualify even for toxic convertible finanQ.-1/17/2000
4964 <i>Is it just me, or has anyone else had a hell of a time finding copies Jeffrey S. Mitchell-1/17/2000
4963 I am inclined to believe that that agreement is in effect. I believe as was posTideGlider-1/17/2000
4962 Y'know, this wouldn't be as critical right now if the Amrhein Foley deaTommy Hicks-1/17/2000
4961 My argument from the beginning is that it makes no sense for HITT to front the TideGlider-1/16/2000
4960 I dunno TG, someone's got some splanin' to do between now and April. ITommy Hicks-1/16/2000
4959 I'm now getting an idea why none of the sheep on RB could find anything gooMighty_Mezz-1/16/2000
4958 DEBTOR(S): BETTER HOME FINANCIAL GROUP [BUSINESS] 120 BONITA AVE #Q.-1/15/2000
4957 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL CASE INDEX CASEQ.-1/15/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):