SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The Boxing Ring Revived
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
7720 16 0
Emcee:  Neocon Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
5240Rats. I know you're not a radical feminist, but I thought the women's aThe Philosopher-3/6/2003
5239<i>I think it is where God is concerned. </i> Sorry, I don't buLane3-3/6/2003
5238When you interview someone possessed by the Devil, can't you count that as iThe Philosopher-3/6/2003
5237<i>You don't need any women because the idea that there is a "womLane3-3/6/2003
5236<i>Denying is not the same thing as compartmentalizing. </i> I thinThe Philosopher-3/6/2003
5235<i> He cures people by blowing on them, then they usually faint. It&#The Philosopher-3/6/2003
5234That's a very interesting article. Thanks for posting it.The Philosopher-3/6/2003
5233<i>as long as they get the facts straight</i> It would be interestiLane3-3/6/2003
5232<i> The government was ultimately involved when the police were called. &lTimF-3/6/2003
5231<i>He cures people by blowing on them, then they usually faint.</i> Lane3-3/6/2003
5230<i>OK. I'm going to quit badgering you now.</i> What, and end tThe Philosopher-3/6/2003
5229<i>You can't sacrifice your obligation to spread the gospel to your prLane3-3/6/2003
5228Actually, I will answer it after all. if there were such a thing as pure journaThe Philosopher-3/6/2003
5227You might find him entertaining, up to a point. Personally, I think the guy is mTom Clarke-3/6/2003
5226I believe he's a scam artist. He cures people by blowing on them, then they Tom Clarke-3/6/2003
5225Kicking the Secularist Habit A six-step program by David Brooks Like a lTom Clarke-3/6/2003
5224OK. I'm going to quit badgering you now. But it really frosts me that someLane3-3/6/2003
5223Bingo. <hg>The Philosopher-3/6/2003
5222<i>The government was ultimately involved when the police were called. TheThe Philosopher-3/6/2003
5221<i>Ah, now that's a totally different question, isn't it? </i&gLane3-3/6/2003
5220I guess the site wasn't aimed at us.The Philosopher-3/6/2003
5219Ah, now that's a totally different question, isn't it?The Philosopher-3/6/2003
5218<I>One thing you failed to notice. There was no restriction of speech by tRock_nj-3/6/2003
5217Yes, they did. Interesting that, as I recall, they won, but decided to march elThe Philosopher-3/6/2003
5216The problem is, that if you're a true evangelical, it is your responsibilityThe Philosopher-3/6/2003
5215<i>No "Our Mission" or "Our Purpose" or any similar stLane3-3/6/2003
5214<i>You've probably seen him. He's the guy with the impossible hairLane3-3/6/2003
5213<i>So, you're confident you could sort out the evangelical Post staffeThe Philosopher-3/6/2003
5212<i>If you read a story that starts "Satan's handiwork was clearlyLane3-3/6/2003
5211Wheat Case Moves Ahead at WTO By JACK SULLIVAN 03/06/2003 13:10:07 EST The UnitTimF-3/6/2003
5210One interesting thing about his website is that nowhere could I find a simple stThe Philosopher-3/6/2003
5209I think they had a better case then the t-shirt wearers at the mall. TimTimF-3/6/2003
5208<i>I may not be able to define it, but I know it when I see it.</i> Lane3-3/6/2003
5207Nope. Just the right to intentionally demonstrate where they could stir up the The Philosopher-3/6/2003
5206<i>I'm going to check out Benny Hinn. Never heard of him</i> YoTom Clarke-3/6/2003
5205To my knowledge the Nazis is Skokie didn't insist on the right to march on sTimF-3/6/2003
5204The Double Dog Dare is trifling compared to wishing a curse upon one's moustTom Clarke-3/6/2003
5203<i>...Don't you understand that there is a principle at stake here? AlTimF-3/6/2003
5202Well, here's one way. If you read a story that starts "Satan's hanThe Philosopher-3/6/2003
5201You're right, I didn't answer your question. It doesn't have an easThe Philosopher-3/6/2003
Previous 40 | Next 40 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):