SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
QQQ - Nasdaq 100 Trust
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
840 98 0 QQQ
Emcee:  M CAHILL Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
540Freddy- agree-- but mainly because I strongly doubt such a long protracted downdTopannuity-5/2/2001
539Freddy- agree-- but mainly because I strongly doubt such a long protracted downdTopannuity-5/2/2001
538Striper, I don't consider myself much of a prognosticator, but markets neithFred Gohlke-5/2/2001
537The economic fundamentals did not justify the gloomy predictions. of the past festriper68-5/1/2001
536Hi David, It seems like when QQQ was sagging in the middle there was more postinOldAIMGuy-4/27/2001
535Ken, I analyze market internals in the Nasdaq to identify buying opportunities. davidk555-4/11/2001
534I got out in January but them bought about 50 qqq at 60 and 78 which is a small robert duke-4/9/2001
533Well that was a long time ago. Not now. I bought the QQQ at 60 and 78 and I guesrobert duke-4/9/2001
532davidk, I'm coming in late here. What are the areas in which you look for Ken Adams-4/9/2001
531david555, I think pull backs are normal and to be expected. Last year we had 3 dmoufassa7-4/8/2001
530><i>That may be true, Sir or Madam, as the case may be, but fortunately10K a day-4/8/2001
529What happened before FWIW: 5/23 - new low 5/24 - QQQs closed higher 5/25 - QQgeode00-4/8/2001
528Thanks Tom, David and moufassa7. I track these market internals frequently, anddavidk555-4/8/2001
527davidk, looks like you do your homework. I also use divergences for market analymoufassa7-4/8/2001
526Hi DK, I follow some similar data on a weekly basis and saw an "easing"OldAIMGuy-4/6/2001
525Thanks David for your hard work.David L. Hoevener-4/5/2001
524LOL!bob wallace-4/5/2001
523I thought some of you would find this e-mail I sent out last night of interest. davidk555-4/5/2001
522LTK007: "this QQQ thread is doomed if ruled by brain dead dinosaurs of the Fred Gohlke-4/5/2001
521this QQQ thread is doomed if ruled by brain dead dinosaurs of the extinct mania.LTK007-4/5/2001
520Hi QQQ fans, Take a quick look at the NDX "Heatmap" this AM. screeniOldAIMGuy-4/5/2001
519"i beg to differ,there is zero basis to your beliefs that QQQ will get backStill Rolling-4/5/2001
518i beg to differ,there is zero basis to your beliefs that QQQ will get back to 10LTK007-4/5/2001
517Robert Duke, thanks for the response. Great job getting out in January. Best oanon-4/4/2001
516I know your not picking on me, don't worry. I transfered all my roth IRA casrobert duke-4/4/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News