ocom breakthrough technology | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
ocom breakthrough technology

An SI Board Since April 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
994	11	0	OCOM

Emcee: james nowak	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
544	I agree.	tonto	-	7/20/1998
543	Tonto, Genie make a very firm statement that they were not compensated by OCOM.	Roger A. Babb	-	7/20/1998
542	<<Stock Genie has a pretty big audience , Does anyone see the stock jumpi	mod	-	7/20/1998
541	<<Yes, I would say that OCOM is in the same class as CCSI. I am short bot	mod	-	7/20/1998
540	<<Does anyone know for a fact that they were not compensated by OCOM? >	mod	-	7/20/1998
539	We don't need Stock Genie. We need sales. Fix the problem.	Willy	-	7/20/1998
538	The WSJ article on the net did not speak well of stock genie. I wonder if those	tonto	-	7/20/1998
537	RumbleFish, that is known in the industry as pump & dump. Yes, I would say	Roger A. Babb	-	7/19/1998
536	I think you have to consider that most or all of their previous picks PAID them	mod	-	7/19/1998
535	<< Does anyone see the stock jumping tomorrow because of this pick>>	Dante Sinferno	-	7/19/1998
534	<<THE STOCK GENIE'S TRACK RECORD In July of 1997 we profiled our firs	Harpo	-	7/19/1998
533	<<Stock Genie has a pretty big audience , Does anyone see the stock jumpi	RumbleFish	-	7/19/1998
532	TO ANYONE ref to #523 Stock Genie has a pretty big audience , Does anyone see	BIDLOW	-	7/19/1998
531	If the terms were "negotiated", why assume that OCOM wanted a call pe	LPasko	-	7/19/1998
530	If the terms were solely up to the investors, there would not be an Oct. 6th da	mod	-	7/18/1998
529	That is an excellent summary and brings all up to date. It puts the risk a li	John F. Dowd	-	7/18/1998
528	As I said, they are free to short all they want after October 5. I don't t	John F. Dowd	-	7/18/1998
527	Tonto, they <b>manufactured</b> something, it just doesn't <	Dale Baker	-	7/18/1998
526	How does a company with zero revenues qualify as a leading manufacturer? OCOM	tonto	-	7/18/1998
525	Are you suggesting that management controlled the financing terms instead of th	tonto	-	7/18/1998
524	Here are the relevant parts of the 8-K, enclosed in []. << Steve: I thou	Steve Patterson	-	7/18/1998
523	I found this in my e-mail, V Dear Subscribers: *****************************	P.Hronis	-	7/17/1998
522	Thanks for jogging my memory.	telephonics	-	7/17/1998
521	Steve: I thought there was no shorting if the stock was below 10.78 and that	John F. Dowd	-	7/17/1998
520	<<Dennis,do you think ocom will finish product this Q as Rogers said in p	mod	-	7/17/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):