Silicon Investor, under the hood | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Silicon Investor, under the hood

An SI Board Since December 2004

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
81	21	0

Emcee: SI Bob	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
56	David, <i>did you have that thread bookmarked?</i> I have it bookm	Joe NYC	-	9/17/2005
55	i recently found out about this trick in sql and had an opportunity to try it ou	Green Receipt	-	9/17/2005
54	did you have that thread bookmarked?	Green Receipt	-	9/17/2005
53	SI Bob, I found this post in my "in-box" (public messages) Message 21	Joe NYC	-	9/16/2005
52	You can end up being very surprised by the benefits you gain with the nolock hin	SI Bob	-	2/4/2005
51	Select * from table with(nolock) does no locking and does not respect other lock	SI Dave	-	2/3/2005
50	I've never heard of the 'with nolock'... I'm going to take a loo	Green Receipt	-	2/3/2005
49	It's worthwhile overkill. If all you're doing is reads, with (nolock) h	SI Bob	-	2/3/2005
48	I don't know if it's overkill, but I've modified almost every query	SI Dave	-	2/3/2005
47	<i>For oracle we've found that sometimes you have to tell the engine y	SI Bob	-	2/3/2005
46	First, request.form(str)? Not request.querystring(str)? Also, I had no idea yo	SI Bob	-	2/3/2005
45	The reason why I asked is you could use it to your advantage. Something like th	Green Receipt	-	1/11/2005
44	Beats me. I gave up trying to figure out what was happening when I got it to wor	SI Dave	-	1/11/2005
43	I know you already solved this but why were you getting an extra ',' pri	Green Receipt	-	1/11/2005
42	Just found this thread and I'll try to help if i can and if you need it. fw	Green Receipt	-	1/11/2005
41	Well, as you suggested I managed to brute-force the querystring into a 2-level a	SI Dave	-	1/8/2005
40	I don't speak vb.net so it is tough. What I'm suggesting is that you ass	Tom C	-	1/8/2005
39	Tom, thanks but I don't know how to convert what you are suggesting into pra	SI Dave	-	1/8/2005
38	<i>For Each item In Request.form("str")</i> Another sugge	Tom C	-	1/8/2005
37	I'm used to C# and I can't try this right now but I would look at gettin	Tom C	-	1/8/2005
36	VB.NET help needed parsing a query string: I guess I'm not declaring the it	SI Dave	-	1/8/2005
35	<i>>>Only change I'd prefer is that both are "Show..."	SI Dave	-	12/23/2004
34	Only change I'd prefer is that both are "Show...". Prefer the log	SI Bob	-	12/23/2004
33	The routine to populate the new subjectmark fields is ready. I assumed bits woul	SI Dave	-	12/22/2004
32	The new code in subject.aspx was throwing errors on null tickers. I replaced the	SI Dave	-	12/22/2004

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):